A couple more intake options for the 00+ guys
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City South Dakota
In the second pic the tubing further down really does look smooth. If the Intense FWI seems to work the best then I guess there is no other option until something else comes along that is proven, just wish it was a little better looking for $180.
BANNED
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
Originally Posted by blackbuick1987
In the second pic the tubing further down really does look smooth. If the Intense FWI seems to work the best then I guess there is no other option until something else comes along that is proven, just wish it was a little better looking for $180.
i know dillcc drilled a hole in his filter and put the IAT in there, saved himself ~$50?
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Wappingers Falls, NY
Originally Posted by J Wikoff
Any idea where the KR came from?
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Wappingers Falls, NY
Originally Posted by 67Goat
WHOA! - surprised no one else is running the JNB intakes! I beg to differ with anyone not having luck with these. I have been running this intake for nearly a year now and have no problems whatsoever with it. It was a bit tougher to install than a simple flex hose, but when done correctly 
have had no issues. (I think my time slips also support the performance results as well)
have had no issues. (I think my time slips also support the performance results as well)
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City South Dakota
Originally Posted by Explr1
Originally Posted by J Wikoff
Any idea where the KR came from?
BANNED
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: Wappingers Falls, NY
Originally Posted by blackbuick1987
Originally Posted by Explr1
Originally Posted by J Wikoff
Any idea where the KR came from?
Cost:
4" tubing from ZZP $40.38 shipped *I ordered four feet, you only three*
2- PVC couplers $6.00
2- SS 4" clamps $7.00
1- 9" filter $30.00
Total= $83.38
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
That'* the one-piece pictured. There'* an option for a 2-piece based on a fell-founded suggestion I made to him when he was developing it. I'd strongly encourage you to go with the 2-piece. There'* ample engine flex under heavy load/launches.
From just over a year ago:
Now we're talking. The L36 outnumbers the L67 by 10:1 for each year. I like the idea of adding it as an option rather than jacking the price for all, but I still think the 'hump' (I like the term) should be a recommended option for L36 and L67 without the solid motor mount.
From just over a year ago:
Originally Posted by willwren
Have you considered having the pipe in two pieces with another flexible coupling in the middle to account for flex?
From my standpoint as an outsider looking in, I see a pretty exlusive market for 3 model years. 2000-2003. Very few have the solid motor mount, and those are the only ones that could consider it. But with some flex in the middle, and a bushing in that hole, it would work for all 3 years regardless of mounts.
The INTENSE FWI is 3.5", but that'* due (perhaps) to the fact that the tubing isn't perfectly smooth inside. Close, but not as smooth as what you have. There'* some potential here, but still a pretty exclusive market.
From my standpoint as an outsider looking in, I see a pretty exlusive market for 3 model years. 2000-2003. Very few have the solid motor mount, and those are the only ones that could consider it. But with some flex in the middle, and a bushing in that hole, it would work for all 3 years regardless of mounts.
The INTENSE FWI is 3.5", but that'* due (perhaps) to the fact that the tubing isn't perfectly smooth inside. Close, but not as smooth as what you have. There'* some potential here, but still a pretty exclusive market.
Originally Posted by willwren
Further thought......adding that flex joint in the middle will relieve alot of stress on the UIM of the L36 engine, further opening the market for you. The L36 UIM is plastic, and has a know weak spot directly behind the TB mount in the EGR stovepipe area.
Originally Posted by willwren
Originally Posted by JMB Justin
Adding a hump style coupler would not be a problem at all, but would add about $20 to the overall cost for the extra materials. If it would open up a larger market then it could be added as an option to those who dont have upgraded mounts or have the weak UIM. Again, not a problem at all for me, Im willing to make changes or add options to accomodate and broaden the market. Thanks for your help,
Justin
Justin
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA WCBF '06, '07 survivor
i like mine, smooth as a baby'* butt and BIG. you could be making 500 H.P. and not out flow it. there are pic'* of it somewhere on here. if i had a camera i would post some pic'*, but i don't. i took a look for them but did not find any, i thought Willwren had put some pic'* on here last year, but i had no luck finding them. man you have a lot of post'*.
ROD
p.*. if you don't have a solid front motor mount yet, make one ! !
ROD
p.*. if you don't have a solid front motor mount yet, make one ! !
