Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

RAM.......

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #21  
rjolly87's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,270
Likes: 465
From: Las Cruces, NM
rjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant future
Default

tmanager.jpg

this is how mine looks.

also, find yourself another hard drive to put your swap file on. currently i am running a decent 80 gig hard drive, and i dropped the swap file on a crappy 6.4 gig, and noticed an immediate and very large speed improvement. and that is just with an old crappy hard drive. what could one of them shiney new ones do?

btw, i am running windows 2k, which isnt as bad of a memory hogg as xp is. you should be able to work with 512 meg of ram, but 1 gig should be good also.. but definitely look into getting a second hard drive.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #22  
MOS95B's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,408
Likes: 1
From: Robbinsdale, MN
MOS95B is on a distinguished road
Default

I got a couple of old crappy hard drives...

a 6.4 and a 10.24 gig......
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #23  
big_news_1's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, AZ
big_news_1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by big_news_1
When you're talking RAM, is it true that your machine may run faster with 2 - 512 sticks rather than 1 - 1GB stick? I've heard it'* faster because the system can access both sticks at once instead of only having the bandwidth of one stick. Is this true? If so Nate, you may want to look at 2 - 512s instead of a 1GB stick.
Can anybody confirm or deny this?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #24  
Foghorn's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, QC
Foghorn is on a distinguished road
Default

Here'* my main puppy running;



Cheers,
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:57 PM
  #25  
Sully1742's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Sully1742 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by beckstyle
Would RAM help speed up my other computer at all? I would like to make it faster. I'm not sure how much I have on it now.
Right click on the my computer icon on your desktop and go to properties. Under the general tab under Computer, tell us what it says. There should be your CPU type and speed along with your amount of RAM.

Originally Posted by big_news_1
Originally Posted by big_news_1
When you're talking RAM, is it true that your machine may run faster with 2 - 512 sticks rather than 1 - 1GB stick? I've heard it'* faster because the system can access both sticks at once instead of only having the bandwidth of one stick. Is this true? If so Nate, you may want to look at 2 - 512s instead of a 1GB stick.
Can anybody confirm or deny this?
Yeah, if you run dual channel, it'* better. I like running 2x sticks as aopposed to one so if you have a problem with one, or need to borrow one for another machine you can without a problem.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #26  
kevo's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Greater Cleveland area, Ohio
kevo is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Sully1742
Originally Posted by beckstyle
Would RAM help speed up my other computer at all? I would like to make it faster. I'm not sure how much I have on it now.
Right click on the my computer icon on your desktop and go to properties. Under the general tab under Computer, tell us what it says. There should be your CPU type and speed along with your amount of RAM.

Originally Posted by big_news_1
Originally Posted by big_news_1
When you're talking RAM, is it true that your machine may run faster with 2 - 512 sticks rather than 1 - 1GB stick? I've heard it'* faster because the system can access both sticks at once instead of only having the bandwidth of one stick. Is this true? If so Nate, you may want to look at 2 - 512s instead of a 1GB stick.
Can anybody confirm or deny this?
Yeah, if you run dual channel, it'* better. I like running 2x sticks as aopposed to one so if you have a problem with one, or need to borrow one for another machine you can without a problem.
Yep, one gig (2 x 512) will do you nicely. Just try to get 1T, not 2T. Also, get the PC 2700, not the 2100.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88bonnsse
Lounge
1
Sep 4, 2007 03:53 PM
Paulnold
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
2
Nov 29, 2002 12:57 AM
94_SSEi_Custom
1992-1999
3
Oct 24, 2002 10:27 AM
Tonyrodz
1987-1991
14
Oct 20, 2002 12:27 AM
jasonapr78
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2002 12:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 PM.