Lets all point and laugh at the Tempo
07-06-2005, 10:34 PM
#11
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by willwren
Geez. My Honda is only HALF that slow. Maybe it'* the 5-speed advantage.
07-06-2005, 10:35 PM
#12
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by willwren
Geez. My Honda is only HALF that slow. Maybe it'* the 5-speed advantage.
The Spaz is solid but has the throttle responce of a fat man running up hill
07-07-2005, 02:14 AM
#16
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by captainmiller
Needs work? What the H*** is wrong with it? 
after that, the list gets pretty extensive.
07-07-2005, 02:24 AM
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol. I don't know how you could even drive that. heh. I thought it was bad enough once driving a 26 second car. It was a 1982 Chevette. That car took 26 seconds to get to 60 and couldnt' go much faster than that. I had it floored anytime I was accelerating. It'* hard not to floor it constantly when it'* THAT slow. heh. I gave that car back to my friend and said I never wanted to drive it again. haha.
07-07-2005, 03:58 AM
#18
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brunswick, Georgia, USA, North American Continent, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.3 stang? Was that the Fox-body-era Mustang with the four banger in it? I had an '89 as my first car, lol :P. She ran okay (due to the fact that my stepfather had replaced nearly every single vital component in the thing during his previous ownership) but, God, the thing barely got out of it'* own way, much less anyone else'*.: At least it SOUNDED fast, hehe :P Damn thing screamed like a bitch when you tried to get her to accelerate to any tolerable degree. Ah, those were the days, lol
