mitsu 3.8 and gm 3.8
08-30-2005, 12:30 AM
#41
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by Ryan
Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
I have to say this, though. In reality, if the L36 designers threw efficiency to the wind, they could have easily matched the hp/tq output of that mitsu engine with the same gas mileage.
I'm not one-sided, as I'm about the only one here that likes Fords (which uses Mitsubishi engines
)
I'm not one-sided, as I'm about the only one here that likes Fords (which uses Mitsubishi engines
)
:?: what about ford boy? he likes fords too.
and this Mitsubishi comment is interesting, as i thought it was dodge that did that.
but, because i have to,
[/off topic]
but i wouldnjt mind seeing a thread on this.
08-30-2005, 12:35 AM
#42
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reutlingen, Baden-Wurttemburg, Germany
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah I am familiar with the Chrysler/Mistu connection (at least that is used to exist) but have never heard anything about Ford...maybe you are thinking Mazda engines?
08-30-2005, 10:33 AM
#43
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1993 SLE
the 3800 made the 10 best list......beat that
08-30-2005, 10:53 AM
#44
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know Ford uses Mazda parts several of the transmisions are almost identical between the 2 both made in the Ford plant in KY. Later we will ned to start a topic FORD 3.8 Vs 3800 SII
08-30-2005, 07:35 PM
#45
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by Phantom
I know Ford uses Mazda parts several of the transmisions are almost identical between the 2 both made in the Ford plant in KY. Later we will ned to start a topic FORD 3.8 Vs 3800 SII
[/off topic]
08-30-2005, 07:37 PM
#46
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rjolly87
Originally Posted by Ryan
Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
I have to say this, though. In reality, if the L36 designers threw efficiency to the wind, they could have easily matched the hp/tq output of that mitsu engine with the same gas mileage.
I'm not one-sided, as I'm about the only one here that likes Fords (which uses Mitsubishi engines )
I'm not one-sided, as I'm about the only one here that likes Fords (which uses Mitsubishi engines
) :?: what about ford boy? he likes fords too.
and this Mitsubishi comment is interesting, as i thought it was dodge that did that.
but, because i have to,
[/off topic]
but i wouldnjt mind seeing a thread on this.
08-31-2005, 12:52 AM
#47
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Yeah, some of the Taurus SHO models had Yamaha V6 powerplants. Maybe some others did, too.
I wasn't trying to start a war with my comments, but I'm really beginning to realize that modding my L36 can only take me so far. Even if I spend $10,000 on the biggest, baddest N/A motor in the 3800 community, I'll still only be on par with some other V6 technology. It'* a sad fact, but we'll just have to take it in stride.
Also, I know power isn't everything. When you compare the Bonneville experience in general with the Eclipse, you're getting a more luxurious car with the Bonneville. Yes, an Eclipse may be able to beat some of us in a 1/4 mile, but will he be able to haul around a family of five while still being able to smoke the tires? I think not. I still love the Bonnie for what it is as a complete automotive package.
I wasn't trying to start a war with my comments, but I'm really beginning to realize that modding my L36 can only take me so far. Even if I spend $10,000 on the biggest, baddest N/A motor in the 3800 community, I'll still only be on par with some other V6 technology. It'* a sad fact, but we'll just have to take it in stride.
Also, I know power isn't everything. When you compare the Bonneville experience in general with the Eclipse, you're getting a more luxurious car with the Bonneville. Yes, an Eclipse may be able to beat some of us in a 1/4 mile, but will he be able to haul around a family of five while still being able to smoke the tires? I think not. I still love the Bonnie for what it is as a complete automotive package.
08-31-2005, 10:42 PM
#49
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by repinS
Well, you could haul A$$ and smoke tires with two adults complaining and sardine-canned in the back with the Eclipse 
09-01-2005, 09:34 PM
#50
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sure these cars both have 3.8'* in them... but i really don't think we should be comparing Bonnevilles and Eclipses. ****, Pontiac doesn't even have a car to compare to the eclipse. GO PONTIAC! (way to replace the sunfire, bitches)