Forced Induction All questions and problems regarding Superchargers, Turbos, NOS, ZEX, intercoolers, water injection, etc.

3.4 verses 3.5 pulley size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2006, 01:39 PM
  #41  
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
BillBoost37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Your tension will take up most of the slack if you stick with an original belt. However over the life of the belt it may strectch beyond the tensioner and you could get slppage.
Old 05-25-2006, 03:03 PM
  #42  
jdq
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
jdq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario , Canada
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jdq is on a distinguished road
Default

Agreed,thats what I should have said
Old 05-25-2006, 10:21 PM
  #43  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
dynomite4224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dynomite4224 is on a distinguished road
Default

ok thats cool becasue i just replaced the belt say 2 months ago....it be dumb to buy another one if i dindt have to
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sickness90
1992-1999
3
02-17-2009 12:02 PM
triff
1992-1999
1
03-03-2007 07:30 AM
Tonioseven
1987-1991
8
02-07-2005 09:52 AM
TelePlayer
Forced Induction
6
08-05-2003 07:27 PM
Mark Peters
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
10
03-21-2003 08:42 PM



Quick Reply: 3.4 verses 3.5 pulley size



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.