3.4 verses 3.5 pulley size
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
Originally Posted by dbtk2
We all know he'll get KR with a 3.4 so why recommend it?
The only unknown is that I bought the 3.4 at the end of October and have not scanned it above 80 F degrees.
And also you have abnormally low KR compared to just about every other L67 car I've ever seen.
so wait if i buy the 3.5 pully for my car would it be ok would it be ok to run with an intake only, or would i have to drop the plugs....or does all that depend on the kr? n also if i buy a 180 degree them i can leave it in all year right? i live in buffalo, becasue i was also thinkin bout having my pcm upgraded by intense and i just wanted to make sure it would be ok to leave on 180 degree through winter also.
I'm assuming you gutted the front and back of the airbox....opened up the front to the full rectange instead of the oval hole they give you and dropped in a K&N?
That should be good. I ran that setup most of the winter. Recently I added more stuff..but that'* off topic.
That should be good. I ran that setup most of the winter. Recently I added more stuff..but that'* off topic.
alrighty well that sounds good then...so ill look into buying the 3.5 pully and the gator back belt and then should i just rent the puller? im not sure were else i could get one from...
Hey Boostie, don't you have a Hulkspeed front PEM installed?
That'* why you are seeing such low KR with still using the stock airbox (even gutted).
My old 1999 SSEi with the 3.4", drilled 180* t-stat, NGK TR 55'* (0.58"), Magnaflow muffler, Taylor Spiro Pro 8MM wires and gutted stock air box was seeing 3-5* KR. With the 3" HF cat and resonator and CAI the new owner installed it now see'* .5*-2* KR. I am going to be setting him up with PEMs shortly and that should cure all his KR issues.
In this situation, a lightly modded car (3.4 or 3.5 pulley, CAI, PCM, and little or no exhaust mods) will definitely benefit from PEM'*. While Headers will be superior powerwise, PEMs are the feasible way to eliminate small amounts of KR (given the fuel system is in top shape), gaining lost power, and developing a smoother revving engine that also will benefit in the MPG'* department.
That'* why you are seeing such low KR with still using the stock airbox (even gutted).
My old 1999 SSEi with the 3.4", drilled 180* t-stat, NGK TR 55'* (0.58"), Magnaflow muffler, Taylor Spiro Pro 8MM wires and gutted stock air box was seeing 3-5* KR. With the 3" HF cat and resonator and CAI the new owner installed it now see'* .5*-2* KR. I am going to be setting him up with PEMs shortly and that should cure all his KR issues.
In this situation, a lightly modded car (3.4 or 3.5 pulley, CAI, PCM, and little or no exhaust mods) will definitely benefit from PEM'*. While Headers will be superior powerwise, PEMs are the feasible way to eliminate small amounts of KR (given the fuel system is in top shape), gaining lost power, and developing a smoother revving engine that also will benefit in the MPG'* department.






