Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

Pully question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #1  
Danthurs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired Senior Admin

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 43
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Danthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to all
Default Pully question

I'm considering adding headers to my 97 and I'm wondering how small can I go with my SC pully. Can I go below a 3.4"? or will I run in to KR problems. Also, what will be the ball park estimate on HP increase from stock manifolds and stock SC pully. Thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #2  
1993 SLE's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 1
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

there is no magic formula to say what will and what wont give you KR

Typically, you need rockers and the headers/PEM'* before you can put on the 3.2....

I dont see a PCM listed in the Mods either....
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #3  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Get a scantool or scangauge first. Then try a pulley or two and see what your car will tolerate.

I suggest waiting until you get a PCM. Seems the S2 really favors a PCM to get the most out of a 3.4" pulley with no KR.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #5  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

I didn't say that.

Some cars can step to a 3.5, some to a 3.4. The only way to know is to be able to scan.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
McGrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
From: Wickliffe, Ohio
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

Scanning is key!

I had a FWI, TOG headers w/ full exhaust and a Intense standard PCM on my old L67 and I stuck with a 3.4" I probably would have dropped to a 3.3" but I spun a bearing before I was able to scan.


But if you do get headers I would say it would be relatively safe to go to a 3.3".

Ed
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #7  
Danthurs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired Senior Admin

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 43
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Danthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to all
Default

I do plan to get a PCM as well, didn't mention that, sorry. I figure I'll try a 3.4 first and see how that goes, then perhaps try a 3.3 and see how it works. I can always go back to a 3.4 if it'* a problem.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #8  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

3.3? No way.

3.5 or 3.4"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bonnie99
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
19
Feb 17, 2009 08:11 PM
Moemar
1992-1999
7
Apr 14, 2004 10:23 AM
Moemar
1992-1999
2
Mar 12, 2004 08:18 PM
Custom88
Forced Induction
12
Sep 12, 2003 07:03 PM
L27Buick
General GM Chat
2
Jul 27, 2003 03:59 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 AM.