Intense FWI
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Central Illinois

So i was lookin at the FWI'* offered by intense and the one for 98-03 cars is 179.99 which is about $80 more expensive then all the other applications, so i added all the stuff up
1. 3 ft of intake tubing about $36
2. 9" K n N Cone Filter $45
3. PCM Tray $16.99
All adds up to be a little under $100
not added in the cost would be the coupler and the ring tightner things
but i dont understand why they would be an extra $80??
1. 3 ft of intake tubing about $36
2. 9" K n N Cone Filter $45
3. PCM Tray $16.99
All adds up to be a little under $100
not added in the cost would be the coupler and the ring tightner things
but i dont understand why they would be an extra $80??
you can also relocate the IAT (i'm in the process of figuring out a way to do that/where I want it)...i can sell you the reinforced silicone coupler with IAT hole for cheap....
Get an extension harness and relocate the IAT to the filter or directly above it:

Not here:

I found 2 FWI'* at WCBF that had the IAT sensor body heatsoaked on a VERY hot day. Granted this is an extreme case, but the best bet is to go UPstream.

Not here:

I found 2 FWI'* at WCBF that had the IAT sensor body heatsoaked on a VERY hot day. Granted this is an extreme case, but the best bet is to go UPstream.
Originally Posted by willwren
Granted this is an extreme case, but the best bet is to go UPstream.
and yes, the t-bolt clamps and that coupler are not cheap parts
In the S1'* the sensor was in the airbox and therefore 92-95 I can see where this makes sense. For the 96-99'* however.. the pcm is programmed to expect the heatsoaked temps.
Overall..I doublt there'* much of a difference in either position.
Overall..I doublt there'* much of a difference in either position.
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
Overall..I doublt there'* much of a difference in either position.
I'm not so sure I'd call it failed logic. In WillWren'* case it makes sense ... he'* keeping it in an area similar to stock. Therefore the PCM/ECU is seeing things as expected. With the lack of tuning ability on the S1'* and the restriction of no tuning or programming easily or quickly attainable.. it'* about the best that can be done.





