curious about throttle body mod's
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Lake Forest, CA

Originally Posted by lash
As far as it'* worth, that is for you to decide. Did you read this thread (right below yours)?
L67 Throttle Body Improvements
L67 Throttle Body Improvements
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Lake Forest, CA

Originally Posted by willwren
ZZP'* TB (just looked at it, when did they start offering those?) is just another adaptation of what I did 2 years ago. I doubt there would be much difference between their trapezoid shaft and my double flat. If they had countersunk and used flat head screws like I did on Don'*, Boosty'*, and the other 3 of mine, they could have reduced turbulence even further.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Lake Forest, CA

Originally Posted by Foghorn
Buy yourself some rockers instead, much more bang for the buck with the mods you have.
Cheers,
Cheers,
Personally...and this is w/o any data to back it up. I feel that the turbulance is minimal, compared to the flow gained by removing all this material from being in the way of the flow...restricting it.
I believe there is a better flow..
As for laminar flow and turbulance.. yeah yeah.. I'm running a gutted airbox and formerly did an accordian tube.. no turbulance or KR issues were noticed in all my scanning.
I noticed the flow difference..
I believe there is a better flow..
As for laminar flow and turbulance.. yeah yeah.. I'm running a gutted airbox and formerly did an accordian tube.. no turbulance or KR issues were noticed in all my scanning.
I noticed the flow difference..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DeeGee96SE
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
5
Jun 29, 2004 12:21 AM
brminder
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
3
Jul 26, 2002 05:49 AM






