WOW im pissed........BS HERE, help me call this

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

May 16, 2004 | 08:37 PM

#21

PontiacDad

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 6,313

Likes: 2

From: Purgatory

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94Regal

The very fact that you see they have to take things out of there car shows that they are for economy, WHY DO PEOPLE MODIFY THEM!?!?!?!

Hey Rogue if you got your car down to 2000 lbs, what would you run in the 1/4?

I think its 500 lb per .5 second so Id be about 1.5 faster...maybe 12.5ish?

I used 321Hp and 3900lbs for your car Rogue and came up with 14.08sec in the 1/4.
321Hp and 2000lbs works out to 11.27sec in the 1/4.

I have the challenger engine software for the calculations.

May 16, 2004 | 08:44 PM

#22

Rogue

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 6,127

Likes: 1

From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi

Quote:

Originally Posted by PontiacDad

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94Regal

I think its 500 lb per .5 second so Id be about 1.5 faster...maybe 12.5ish?

I used 321Hp and 3900lbs for your car Rogue and came up with 14.08sec in the 1/4.
321Hp and 2000lbs works out to 11.27sec in the 1/4.

I have the challenger engine software for the calculations.

Hmm...how do I shed 1800 lbs?

May 16, 2004 | 09:03 PM

#23

Kennginn

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 3,955

Likes: 3

From: Chicago,IL MWBF '04 SURVIVOR MWBF '05 SURVIVOR Napa Manager

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonneVille

Call him out, take him to the track, and TAKE HIS MONEY!!!

BTW get him to tell you his BS ETs, then make him run those as his dial-ins!!!

i agree with everyone on here

May 16, 2004 | 09:14 PM

#24

94Regal

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Posts like a Turbo

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 310

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by PontiacDad

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94Regal

I think its 500 lb per .5 second so Id be about 1.5 faster...maybe 12.5ish?

I used 321Hp and 3900lbs for your car Rogue and came up with 14.08sec in the 1/4.
321Hp and 2000lbs works out to 11.27sec in the 1/4.

I have the challenger engine software for the calculations.

Hmm...how do I shed 1800 lbs?

My point to all of this is that , almost everyones modified car is fast when they have nothing ( NOTHING ) in it. So whats so special about a 10 second civic that has no seats, dash, etc.?

So having a stock interior civic run 10'* all motor is retarded and

May 17, 2004 | 12:17 AM

#25

SSsuperchargedEi

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 7,551

Likes: 0

From: Pittsburgh, Pa.

SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road

wave the flag and smack him with it

May 17, 2004 | 07:26 AM

#26

repinS

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 5,158

Likes: 0

From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by 94Regal

You know, to each their own. Conversely, many could argue why the hell you took a Buick out to the 1/4

A 2000lb Civic @ 300hp may outrun Rogue'* car @ 300hp @ 2000lb. Why? Gearing. But, only one way to find out

May 17, 2004 | 07:35 AM

#27

94Regal

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Posts like a Turbo

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 310

Likes: 0

Last time I checked there wasnt a stock W-Body L27 running 15.7, there all in the 16'*...........thats why I took it to the track........

Besides, my car is faster than a stock Civic, which is even more embarassing for them :P