View Poll Results: Which one?
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll
Which is worse?
Originally Posted by theJMFC
In what twisted world was the Tempo ever considered to be "sporty"? I want to avoid that world at all costs.
couldnt find any decent pics. but they are out there.
I had an 1985 Tempo I purchased new. It had all the options and ran about 12k in price. Buy the time I was finished paying it off, repairs alone ran me about 20k. Never had a Caravan though.
Originally Posted by rjolly87
Originally Posted by ComfyCar
Caravan
I have yet to see a riced out Caravan so obviously no ricers see potential in it being a performance vehicle.
I've seen Performance Metros,Escorts,Paseos,Accents,early 80'* Civics, Trackers anything car. Never a minivan.
Isnt there a turbo caravan that does 15'*, I think a guy on this forum has his in the 14'*.
I have yet to see a riced out Caravan so obviously no ricers see potential in it being a performance vehicle.
I've seen Performance Metros,Escorts,Paseos,Accents,early 80'* Civics, Trackers anything car. Never a minivan.
Isnt there a turbo caravan that does 15'*, I think a guy on this forum has his in the 14'*.
My 85 Ford EXP was the sporty version of the escort... not bad 1.6L HO could take a 2.3 Rustang.
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, Virginia

I will tell you guys something my parents had two minivans one was a Caravan and the other was a Voyager. The 86' Voyager had a 3.3L V-6 and that thing would haul ***. Now on the other hand we had a 92' Caravan with a 4 banger and that thing should have been run off a cliff, biggest pos my parents had ever bought.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post












