since i'm a lazy bastid

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jul 29, 2004 | 12:04 PM

#31

Rogue

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 6,127

Likes: 1

From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its *** kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

Jul 29, 2004 | 01:05 PM

#32

TrueWildMan

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 5,246

Likes: 3

From: Salina, KS

The Impala SS is doggy as hell, too, until you mod it.

Jul 29, 2004 | 04:49 PM

#33

Burgundy_Boat

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

Jul 29, 2004 | 04:59 PM

#34

Rogue

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 6,127

Likes: 1

From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

Yep, but your still talking a 6 VS an 8

Jul 29, 2004 | 05:00 PM

#35

TrueWildMan

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 5,246

Likes: 3

From: Salina, KS

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

Yep, but your still talking a 6 VS an 8

Okay, how about stock N/A vs. stock N/A?

Jul 29, 2004 | 05:23 PM

#36

repinS

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 5,158

Likes: 0

From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

and then you've got the GTP, which should be able to eat Maurauders stock fer stock very easily.

On topic: Not a fan of the Lincoln'* interior. Something about it screams... taxi... low rent... sub-par for a car like that.

hey... is that a motorized climate control thingie that pops out just beneath the heater vents?

Jul 29, 2004 | 05:39 PM

#37

TrueWildMan

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 5,246

Likes: 3

From: Salina, KS

Quote:

Originally Posted by repinS

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

and then you've got the GTP, which should be able to eat Maurauders stock fer stock very easily.

Once again, forced induction vs. N/A...

Jul 29, 2004 | 05:58 PM

#38

Rogue

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 6,127

Likes: 1

From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueWildMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by repinS

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

and then you've got the GTP, which should be able to eat Maurauders stock fer stock very easily.

Once again, forced induction vs. N/A...

Ok, Wes Blair'* GT vs the Marauder. 6 still beats 8 N/A vs N/A.

Jul 29, 2004 | 06:03 PM

#39

fantastic88

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 4,328

Likes: 1

From: Lakeville, MN

O.k., I found a link to a Marauder review. 0-60 in 7.5 sec and quater mile comes at 15.5sec @91mph. There is a 94-96 Impala comparison in the review and the 94-96 Impala runs the quater a half a second faster than the new Marauder. The new Impala SS is even snappier yet with the L67. However, I am NOT a fan of the new body style vs. the 94-96 which is bada$$. Anyways, here is the link to the review. http://caranddriver.com/article.asp?...rticle_id=1874

Jul 30, 2004 | 08:43 AM

#40

TrueWildMan

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 5,246

Likes: 3

From: Salina, KS

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrueWildMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by repinS

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogue

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy_Boat

for a 4200 lb sedan it moves pretty darn good (14.7-15.3 is pretty good for 300 hp in a 4200 lb car)

And it still gets its A$$ kicked by most of the 00+'* on this board

modded vs. stock sure. stock vs. stock would be an interesting run

and then you've got the GTP, which should be able to eat Maurauders stock fer stock very easily.

Once again, forced induction vs. N/A...

Ok, Wes Blair'* GT vs the Marauder. 6 still beats 8 N/A vs N/A.

STRE-E-E-E-ETCH!!!

I don't know this Wes Blair character, but I assume this GT is all stock N/A comparing to stock N/A Marauder??

Reply Share

First
Prev
4 / 5
Next
Last