Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

sat in a 2002 Aurora 3.5...not impressed

Old Aug 5, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #11  
Shadow's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,239
Likes: 1
From: Delaware & Long Island NY
Shadow is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by marquette97
Originally Posted by Shadow
How can you say the Auroras cheap inside and the bonnevilles not? I could see if you said both felt cheap. I owned a 2005 Bonneville GXP and I thought the interior of my Aurora felt higher quality. I guess both cars have thier plus an minus
because i'm not talking about bonnevilles. My 1998, I will say, doesn't use the greatest materials in the world for sure, but things don't creak nearly as bad as in that aurora, and it'* 4 years older!

One of GM'* better quality interiors from the early 2000'* in terms of materials IMO is the Trailblazer/Bravada/Envoy. The pieces are much more sturdy. The new GMs are better yet, but sadly, the technology is not there. Also, a very underrated interior is from the 1995-1997 Cutlass Supreme. I thought the interior was very stylish and tight on that car. I have a friend with 250,000mi on her'* and absolutley NO squeaks, vibration or rattles! Even the 2000+ Impala, even though the interiors aren't really stylish at all, seem sturdier than the new Aurora/Bonneville/LeSabre.

I wish GM had released cars like the Lucerne and the new impala 8 years ago! The interior quality is so much better.

Well sit in a classic and you will notice a much higher quality feel to it but I am guessing you are looking for something newer. Its a shame but yeah the older Bonneville fellt much more high quality inside than the new one. I especially liked the older bonnevilles leather seats.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #12  
marquette97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
marquette97 is on a distinguished road
Default

actually, newer isn't really an issue, i'm looking more at miles and condition. I like the older Auroras a lot, they are nice cars. I think if I had to get a replacement for my Bonneville (probably next year), I'd get a '98 or '99 aurora. I like the 2004 Toyota Avalons a lot, but I don't have the $$$ lol.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #13  
Shadow's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,239
Likes: 1
From: Delaware & Long Island NY
Shadow is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by marquette97
actually, newer isn't really an issue, i'm looking more at miles and condition. I like the older Auroras a lot, they are nice cars. I think if I had to get a replacement for my Bonneville (probably next year), I'd get a '98 or '99 aurora. I like the 2004 Toyota Avalons a lot, but I don't have the $$$ lol.
Yeah I just sold my 1996 Aurora great cars..
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #14  
CFoote's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
CFoote is on a distinguished road
Default

The only thing I find cheap about my Aurora is the door panels. They are not held in well to the door. I fixed that problem by supporting the clips behind the door. They have a better feel to them now. To be honest, the Aurora has a tighter fit/finish than the '96 Bonne that replaced it, but thats just my personal observation.

There is a lot of things that are left to be desired on the newer Aurora/Bonne cars. Water leaks being a major one, along with light bulbs burning out and a whole host of other things. Every car has its quirks.

Did you take any pictures of the Aurora? I'd be curious to see that mint interior.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 09:17 AM
  #15  
bonnie94ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,308
Likes: 2
bonnie94ssei is on a distinguished road
Default

I love the classic Auroras and one day wouldn't mind owning one. The interior doesn't look or feel cheap to me.

LittleHoov, it'* funny (well not really funny) you mention your warped dash...I've heard the same thing happening to Aleros as well. I was close to buying a GLS once but when I read about one person'* headaches with their Alero I opted out.

If you want to see a cheap GM interior in design AND material, sit in the Monte Carlo. My parents' '03 SS has the worst case of creaking plastic ever. And the design leaves so much to be desired.

Though it has a 'typical' GM interior, at least in design, I'm pretty happy with my 03 SSEi. A huge improvement over the previous Gen. and not really any creaks that I have noticed.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #16  
LittleHoov's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
From: Climax Springs, Missouri
LittleHoov is on a distinguished road
Default

LittleHoov, it'* funny (well not really funny) you mention your warped dash...I've heard the same thing happening to Aleros as well. I was close to buying a GLS once but when I read about one person'* headaches with their Alero I opted out.
Yeah, sadly the interiors of the Alero and Intrigue are almost identical, they even use the same instrument cluster, except that the tach goes higher on the Intrigue. Its sad really since the Intrigue was supposed to be a step up from the Alero, or at least you would think, but inside the car I dont think you could tell much difference between them. Heck, unless youre somewhat car savvy, a lot of people cant tell the difference from the outside either.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff-X
Oldsmobile
10
Aug 1, 2013 07:24 PM
RJ-Buyer
Introductions for new members
8
Dec 10, 2005 07:47 PM
Sol
General GM Chat
18
Aug 15, 2005 10:28 PM
2000SilverBullet
General GM Chat
15
Sep 3, 2003 11:33 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.