I am sick of Al-Quieda
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
I hate to sound like a weiner but we cant really call ourselves any better then the terrorists if we go around beheading them but that doesnt say we cant do raids,
As for Saudi Arabia that country is a joke. They claim they are our allies yet support the terrorists that kill us and second how can we be allies with them and be good about them when they have the third worst human rights record in the middle east only behind Iraq and Afghanistan
As for Saudi Arabia that country is a joke. They claim they are our allies yet support the terrorists that kill us and second how can we be allies with them and be good about them when they have the third worst human rights record in the middle east only behind Iraq and Afghanistan
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,408
Likes: 1
From: Robbinsdale, MN
Originally Posted by ssesc93
hey Mos, shed some light up in here 
Originally Posted by Jim W
Time to bring the boyz home now....y'all arent gonna win this one... :?
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MOS95B
Originally Posted by ssesc93
hey Mos, shed some light up in here
Originally Posted by Jim W
Time to bring the boyz home now....y'all arent gonna win this one... :?
i couldnt agree with you more about that
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,408
Likes: 1
From: Robbinsdale, MN
I dread every day hearing that more of pur soldiers were hurt or killed. There'* a damn good chance that some of my friends from when I was in are there. But, the last thing a soldier wants is for their government to yank them out and make them look weak. Especially in a situation like this, where innocent civilians are paying the price. IF the newsmedia were actually unbiased, and interviewed a lot of the soldiers, you'd probaly get that same response.
Yes, they want to come home. Who wouldn't? But not like that....
Yes, they want to come home. Who wouldn't? But not like that....
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Salina, KS
Worst President in history?
(The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor)
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.*. history.
Let'* clear up one point: President Bush didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists before 9/11. Let'* look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attaced us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, and everage of 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden'* head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama attacked us on multiple occasions. Over 2,900 lives lost on 9/11.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, and average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...
It took laess time to take Iraq than it took janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.
We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton for find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republic Gaurd than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank in the Chappaquiddick.
It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!
I'm sorry, but even up to date, what has happened over there so far can hardly be considered a "slaughter" of our men...
(The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter to the editor)
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.*. history.
Let'* clear up one point: President Bush didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists before 9/11. Let'* look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attaced us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, and everage of 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden'* head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama attacked us on multiple occasions. Over 2,900 lives lost on 9/11.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, and average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...
It took laess time to take Iraq than it took janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.
We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton for find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republic Gaurd than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank in the Chappaquiddick.
It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!
slaughter going on over there