How do we know that first pic is a Ws6 then? I cant see the tail light at all.

I wouldn't be able to tell. You would need to trust the person who posted it. That is a very good question.

Oh, ok, Thats why I said it just looks like a regular v6 Bird, then someone jumped on my case for calling it a v6. Then I thought the Ws6 was the engine configuration or something. ohweeee

Yeah, the V 6 wouldn't have the Ram Air hood that the first one has...so I know it isn't a V 6 bird...but whether it is a standard TransAm or a WS6...who knows?

GTO'* one helluva badass car for what it is, not what it was.

Plus, the interior isn't so... chintzy compared to the Firebird.

Then again, it could of been modded like this one...which also has the ram air, V6Bird

While I agree that the GTO will never match the Firebird for aggressive looks or pure performance, I must say that it was never INTENDED to. The GTO is a MUSCLE car, NOT a pony car.
On the other hand, I've driven Ws6'*, Firehawks, TAs, and even heavily modded V6 Fb'*, and I think that the driving position of the last-gen Fb DESTROYS the drivability of the car.
You can't see the road ahead very well because of the rake of the windshield, you can't see stop-lights unless you're well back from the stop-line, and the belt-line is so high that you CANNOT rest your arm in the window at all.
I think the GTO looks like a much more drivable car, with the power of the Fb, but w/out the drawbacks of such an aggressive body-style.

Lol the 1st firebird I posted was a 2003 (I got the pic off kbb.com) It is a v-8..........it is a anniversary version or something like that

ws6: three foot high wing, 275/40/17 rear tires, fogs in the middle!!!

Ok, the one I posted was a 98 also.