Things to come......fog pics
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
My goal here isn't embarassment or criticism.....but it is:
1. Let'* make sure one of our members gets something he'* happy with in the long run.
2. Let'* reinforce the value of "I'm thinking about these, what do you guys think?" before buying.
Can we have a link to those lights on the 'net?
1. Let'* make sure one of our members gets something he'* happy with in the long run.
2. Let'* reinforce the value of "I'm thinking about these, what do you guys think?" before buying.
Can we have a link to those lights on the 'net?
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY (college)
Originally Posted by willwren
Why on earth would someone produce driving lights with that multi-hole pattern to decrease the total light output?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: republic, mo
[/img]
[/img]
[/img]
[/img]
[/img]
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY (college)
Originally Posted by willwren
The ones you're referring to are a TOTALLY different design.
These don't have 7 seperate lenses, and only one large parabolic reflector. Mimick doesn't produce light.
These don't have 7 seperate lenses, and only one large parabolic reflector. Mimick doesn't produce light.
on a side note
Personally by the pictures I sort of like the output.
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,646
Likes: 0
From: allentown, pa--brooklyn, ny
Originally Posted by willwren
C'mon folks, my intent isn't to be a topic killer.
Surely, I'm not the only person that sees the problem here?
And don't call me shirley.
I'll grant you that they look different, but why reduce the total light output?
Surely, I'm not the only person that sees the problem here?
And don't call me shirley.
I'll grant you that they look different, but why reduce the total light output?