Are there any weak spots on the 97 Auroras?
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Krazy Kyle
Well, yea, the NEW STS is awesome. I was referring to the latest (and last) Seville body styling, both the SLS and STS variants thereof. Those are the ones I think look gay. No, but that new STS is great, man 
I'd love one too but, alas, money doesn't grow on trees for me, either...
Oh well
I'd love one too but, alas, money doesn't grow on trees for me, either...Oh well
the interior leaves me with something to be desired, however. For $70k Canadian, there are a helluva damn lot of cheap spots. As a whole, it'* not that quite up to par with its in-class rivals, ie, Lexus, BMW, etc... hasn't really been since the body style came out in '98.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Georgia, USA, North American Continent, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
You're talking about the interior on the NEW STS? Not the Seville, I'm talking the one that'* called just STS. Hehe, the car mags weren't even that hard on it They said it'* damn close to one of those Mercedes in overall quality, ability and appeal, and for quite a bit less coin, too. Forget which Merc, they're all the same to me, I could care less about them Caddy is coming back, baby 
They said it'* damn close to one of those Mercedes in overall quality, ability and appeal, and for quite a bit less coin, too. Forget which Merc, they're all the same to me, I could care less about them Caddy is coming back, baby
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 6
From: Land of Lincoln
Originally Posted by Krazy Kyle
Oh, and they call the Aurora 4.0L the "Shortstar", lol :P
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Georgia, USA, North American Continent, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Okay, that just makes no sense :? Wouldn't you think the 4.0L would be called the Shortstar due to it'* smaller displacement than the standerd 4.6L? And is the 3.5 even technically related to the Northstar, even? This is so silly, lol
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 6
From: Land of Lincoln
You really will get better answers to many of these questions here at ACNA. Lotsa folks there know lotsa Aurora-related stuff.
[/quote]
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Krazy Kyle
You're talking about the interior on the NEW STS? Not the Seville, I'm talking the one that'* called just STS.
Its cheap touches here and there *really* add up. But the engine still sounds sweet
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, Georgia, USA, North American Continent, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
I figured, repin. And I agree 
Although I haven't ever heard it revved up, the horsey and torque numbers sure are mouth-watering 
But it still looks like *** 
Although I haven't ever heard it revved up, the horsey and torque numbers sure are mouth-watering But it still looks like ***
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xtreme
Bonneville GXP/ Northstar Powered Cars
7
Jan 12, 2004 09:27 PM