Mustang For Sale-izzle!!!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Mustang For Sale-izzle!!!
Hey guys I need your opinion on a used 1990 Ford Mustang for sale I saw in the paper.
Its the 5.0 litre V8 and its priced at $4,000. Anybody have any experience with 'em?
Its the 5.0 litre V8 and its priced at $4,000. Anybody have any experience with 'em?
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 2
And if I remember correctly the traction is terrible with them. They are too lite. The camaros and firebirds are heavier but get the needed traction.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by sse1990
And if I remember correctly the traction is terrible with them. They are too lite. The camaros and firebirds are heavier but get the needed traction.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 3
From: Racine Wi
Originally Posted by sse1990
And if I remember correctly the traction is terrible with them. They are too lite. The camaros and firebirds are heavier but get the needed traction.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Champaign-Granny
Originally Posted by sse1990
And if I remember correctly the traction is terrible with them. They are too lite. The camaros and firebirds are heavier but get the needed traction.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.
the only mustang I like is pre 70, my dad had a 70 mach 1, but the 64 1/2 and up coupe are pretty sweet.
The newer ( late 80'* early 90'* style), well that you would have to get the cobra gt to make it look nice and even then I don't think they are all that hot, but that is just my 0,02$.