just finished....
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 1
From: NEBF:06,07 | NYBF:06,07 | ONBF:06,07 | CNBF:06 & more............
Found the rubber thing on advanced auto parts website
Part Number: H5609
or
Part Number: 505609
or
Part Number: H56092
http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductD...pe=354&ptset=A
Part Number: H5609
or
Part Number: 505609
or
Part Number: H56092
http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductD...pe=354&ptset=A
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
I think the stuff I have is Permatex fully synthetic caliper lube.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS
Expert Gearhead
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
Originally Posted by jr's3800
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
I think the stuff I have is Permatex fully synthetic caliper lube.
Good to see we think alike on doing things right and having the right stuff on hand.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY (college)
did some pad measurements...
(not sure which side is which for sure, but I can guess pretty well form where I left them so...)
what I assume to be the driver side:
Inside pad: 0.345 to .400 = 0.055 difference
Outside pad: 0.262 to .325 = 0.063
passenger side
inside: .390 to .358 = 0.032
outside: .325 to .309 = 0.016
so they were very close to flat. (note: I did not clean or scrape off dust from the pads, so the numbers may be off a bit, but w/e)
the one rotor I measured wasn't accurate due to the lip around the outter edge caused by the brake pads not taking it all off smoothly. but including the lip, the disks where 1.195" across. Min. FSM replacement thickness is something like 1.209"
So I guess I really did need brakes
(not sure which side is which for sure, but I can guess pretty well form where I left them so...)
what I assume to be the driver side:
Inside pad: 0.345 to .400 = 0.055 difference
Outside pad: 0.262 to .325 = 0.063
passenger side
inside: .390 to .358 = 0.032
outside: .325 to .309 = 0.016
so they were very close to flat. (note: I did not clean or scrape off dust from the pads, so the numbers may be off a bit, but w/e)
the one rotor I measured wasn't accurate due to the lip around the outter edge caused by the brake pads not taking it all off smoothly. but including the lip, the disks where 1.195" across. Min. FSM replacement thickness is something like 1.209"
So I guess I really did need brakes
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mremer
2000-2005
16
Nov 15, 2003 11:12 AM