Future of the 3800
#21
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look how that thing is sitting. The front cylinder bank is almost straight up and down while the rear cylinder bank is laying way back. They're probably going to skoot the rear cylinder bank way back passed the fire wall; making it real fun to change spark plugs.
#22
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MACDRIVE
Look how that thing is sitting. The front cylinder bank is almost straight up and down while the rear cylinder bank is laying way back. They're probably going to skoot the rear cylinder bank way back passed the fire wall; making it real fun to change spark plugs.
That'* a way oversimplified explanation, but I wasn't going to go too far off-topic. :P
#23
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Was it the best V6? I don't know if i'd say that, but it'* the SBC of GM V6'*.
Here are the engines that made the 20th century'* top 10 list: (snipped)
6. General Motors Corp. Buick 90* V-6 (1962)
There you have it. So, I beg to differ... It is the best V6.
Originally Posted by [url=http://wardsauto.com/reports/2006/tenbest/
Wards 10 best 2006[/url]]Nissan'* V-6 wins an unprecendented 12th Ward'* 10 Best Engines award.
BMW AG 3L DOHC I-6 (No intro needed)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. 3.5L DOHC V-6 (even better with the 3.7 and 4.0 models coming soon..)
General Motors Corp. 2.8L Turbocharged DOHC V-6 (Saab only currently)
Toyota Motor Corp.(LEXUS) 3.5L DOHC V-6 (306HP, ULEV II, and smooth as silk)
In '07 I expect the SIDI 2.0 Turbo Ecotec (Sol GXP/Sky RL) to replace the 2.0 SC Ecotec engine. It makes 60 more rated HP, is held back even more, and has IMMENSE technological improvements over damn near any turbo engine.
Beg all you want James
But yes i still love it. Easy to work on, easy to maintain, cheap, effective.
#24
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What? Who'* begging? I was just pointing out a neat article. In the article, it did in fact state specifically the 3800 90* Buick V6.
Are you just being argumentative to be argumentative?
**EDIT** Please excuse my above comments, Jason. Didn't mean it that way. I was under some pretty bad pain last night. You'd think that 5 prescriptions of pain-killers and muscle relaxers would cover any pain, hehe.
Are you just being argumentative to be argumentative?
**EDIT** Please excuse my above comments, Jason. Didn't mean it that way. I was under some pretty bad pain last night. You'd think that 5 prescriptions of pain-killers and muscle relaxers would cover any pain, hehe.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Look guys I am a huge buick V6 Fan...
But if you rip into an L36 you'll swear they learned a thing or 2 from chevy with the Series II/III
They are getting the Pushrod 60* engines to make more and more power... 217 Hp and 220 Ft Lbs from a 3500 that can easily have a sticker EPA rating of 32 Hwy when attached to 3.05 gears... I'm pretty impressed with that... But I'd have to ditch the torque management
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
But if you rip into an L36 you'll swear they learned a thing or 2 from chevy with the Series II/III
They are getting the Pushrod 60* engines to make more and more power... 217 Hp and 220 Ft Lbs from a 3500 that can easily have a sticker EPA rating of 32 Hwy when attached to 3.05 gears... I'm pretty impressed with that... But I'd have to ditch the torque management
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#27
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
In '07 I expect the SIDI 2.0 Turbo Ecotec (Sol GXP/Sky RL) to replace the 2.0 SC Ecotec engine. It makes 60 more rated HP
what'* the powerband look like on it though? :?:
does it sacrafice any low end replacing the sc for a turbo?
#29
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Was it the best V6? I don't know if i'd say that, but it'* the SBC of GM V6'*.
Here are the engines that made the 20th century'* top 10 list: (snipped)
6. General Motors Corp. Buick 90* V-6 (1962)
There you have it. So, I beg to differ... It is the best V6.
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Originally Posted by [url=http://wardsauto.com/reports/2006/tenbest/
Wards 10 best 2006[/url]]Nissan'* V-6 wins an unprecendented 12th Ward'* 10 Best Engines award.
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
On that list i'm a fan of...
BMW AG 3L DOHC I-6 (No intro needed)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. 3.5L DOHC V-6 (even better with the 3.7 and 4.0 models coming soon..)
General Motors Corp. 2.8L Turbocharged DOHC V-6 (Saab only currently)
Toyota Motor Corp.(LEXUS) 3.5L DOHC V-6 (306HP, ULEV II, and smooth as silk)
In '07 I expect the SIDI 2.0 Turbo Ecotec (Sol GXP/Sky RL) to replace the 2.0 SC Ecotec engine. It makes 60 more rated HP, is held back even more, and has IMMENSE technological improvements over damn near any turbo engine.
Beg all you want James
But yes i still love it. Easy to work on, easy to maintain, cheap, effective.
BMW AG 3L DOHC I-6 (No intro needed)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. 3.5L DOHC V-6 (even better with the 3.7 and 4.0 models coming soon..)
General Motors Corp. 2.8L Turbocharged DOHC V-6 (Saab only currently)
Toyota Motor Corp.(LEXUS) 3.5L DOHC V-6 (306HP, ULEV II, and smooth as silk)
In '07 I expect the SIDI 2.0 Turbo Ecotec (Sol GXP/Sky RL) to replace the 2.0 SC Ecotec engine. It makes 60 more rated HP, is held back even more, and has IMMENSE technological improvements over damn near any turbo engine.
Beg all you want James
But yes i still love it. Easy to work on, easy to maintain, cheap, effective.
#30
Originally Posted by jr's3800
They are getting the Pushrod 60* engines to make more and more power... 217 Hp and 220 Ft Lbs from a 3500 that can easily have a sticker EPA rating of 32 Hwy when attached to 3.05 gears... I'm pretty impressed with that... But I'd have to ditch the torque management
I think GM makes some of the best V8s around but their V6s have been disappointing me for years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cricha27
General GM Chat
3
05-04-2010 01:25 AM
ColorMeBadd2
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
3
11-19-2006 01:48 AM
99BonnevilleSE
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
4
12-12-2002 05:22 PM