05 Bonneville GXP 4.6l--- VS--- 04 Maruader 4.6l
02-15-2005, 03:27 PM
#32
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
look guys beleive it or not i have a 99 crown vic p.i and it not even faster than the cougar i have. When you say they are built to last, thats not a lie but with all cars the problems come with them and to get off how these cars look and to get back to the subject Bonnie wins!
I sign up on an diffrent forum user name -94cougar4.6- click below and look for the same subject to see how the 4.6l experts are getting on us lol!
http://forums.tccoa.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7
I sign up on an diffrent forum user name -94cougar4.6- click below and look for the same subject to see how the 4.6l experts are getting on us lol!
http://forums.tccoa.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7
02-15-2005, 07:32 PM
#34
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obviously on a forum like this there is going to be some bias.
Stock for stock, someone needs to go out to the track with both cars and race.
For modifications, the Mercury has the edge. The Ford 4.6 is a potent engine, with a heavy aftermarket. The GXP as of now has nearly nothing when it comes to aftermarket.
Stock for stock, someone needs to go out to the track with both cars and race.
For modifications, the Mercury has the edge. The Ford 4.6 is a potent engine, with a heavy aftermarket. The GXP as of now has nearly nothing when it comes to aftermarket.
02-16-2005, 12:41 PM
#36
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fantastic88
The Marauder is slow. 7.6 sec from 0-60mph. 15.8 @88mph in the quarter. Torqueless wonders. They are govorned at 120mph too.
OMG... My truck will take the Maurauder... and my truck is stock!!!!!
02-16-2005, 01:21 PM
#40
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1993bonnie
Yea it would probably take both of them its an 6.0l!
I can assure you that those stats are conservative when listing the 0-60. I wouldn't be surprised if it was as low as 6.8.
I will say that anything in the 7'* for a v8 under 4000lbs I find mildly disapointing. But to each their own.
