Signitures
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Originally Posted by sse1990
I had been asked a while back to make mine smaller, even though I had the same sig for at least 6 months.
As you can see it has been this way since then ( few months).
If I remember correctly in the notice,
which my pictures are. So I may suggest that alot of people read it again, including you Will ( your 94px too wide, LOL). Mods and admins are supposed to be setting examples. My pics combined are no bigger than the maximum width and height.
Just a suggestion, to keep everyone happy, or at least try to, hehe.
As you can see it has been this way since then ( few months).
If I remember correctly in the notice,
As a reminder, I ask members to be mindful of our dial up friends.
Please edited your signature images to be no bigger the 250x500 or 500x250 pixels depending on orientation.
Thank you
Please edited your signature images to be no bigger the 250x500 or 500x250 pixels depending on orientation.
Thank you
Just a suggestion, to keep everyone happy, or at least try to, hehe.
Please make it at least size 9...shink the photo a little or I can do it for you without pixelation. (if thats a word)
Originally Posted by willwren
Changes are coming. Defined requirements.
Tighter than before.
Tighter than before.
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
Hans, my current sig pic is only 100px high, not 200.
And at 700 wide, you have to take into account the width of the sidebar and low-res formats. It causes some people to scroll.
There will be an announcement soon. We're firming up the details and getting a couple things in place first.
And at 700 wide, you have to take into account the width of the sidebar and low-res formats. It causes some people to scroll.
There will be an announcement soon. We're firming up the details and getting a couple things in place first.
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta WCBF_'05_Survivor WCBF_'06_Survivor WCBF_'07_Survivor
Myself, I think the limit should be, something like 500x100 for a picture sig. Even at the maximum size of that, with lots of detail, the picture will be at most, a couple hundred kilobytes. People using dial up will still be able to load that one picture in seconds.
As for text, a few lines, even 4 or 5 wouldnt be so bad, as long as the font size isnt huge.
As for storage of all those pictures, lets say 1000 people, with 100KB signatures each, that equals 100MB. For storage, thats nothing.
As for loading times, lets say there are 20 people posting per page, each with a 100KB signature. Thats 2MB, even with 56K that would be a max of a few minutes.
As for text, a few lines, even 4 or 5 wouldnt be so bad, as long as the font size isnt huge.
As for storage of all those pictures, lets say 1000 people, with 100KB signatures each, that equals 100MB. For storage, thats nothing.
As for loading times, lets say there are 20 people posting per page, each with a 100KB signature. Thats 2MB, even with 56K that would be a max of a few minutes.
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,798
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Slayer636
Myself, I think the limit should be, something like 500x100 for a picture sig. Even at the maximum size of that, with lots of detail, the picture will be at most, a couple hundred kilobytes. People using dial up will still be able to load that one picture in seconds.
As for text, a few lines, even 4 or 5 wouldnt be so bad, as long as the font size isnt huge.
As for storage of all those pictures, lets say 1000 people, with 100KB signatures each, that equals 100MB. For storage, thats nothing.
As for loading times, lets say there are 20 people posting per page, each with a 100KB signature. Thats 2MB, even with 56K that would be a max of a few minutes.
As for text, a few lines, even 4 or 5 wouldnt be so bad, as long as the font size isnt huge.
As for storage of all those pictures, lets say 1000 people, with 100KB signatures each, that equals 100MB. For storage, thats nothing.
As for loading times, lets say there are 20 people posting per page, each with a 100KB signature. Thats 2MB, even with 56K that would be a max of a few minutes.
IMO the biggest problem has always been the sigs with too much text
