1987-1991 Parley with regards to your 1987 to 1991 Bonneville, Olds 88 or Buick Le Sabre Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

max timing advance at WOT

Old Feb 2, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #1  
maybe2fast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Walled Lake, MI
maybe2fast is on a distinguished road
Default max timing advance at WOT

I have a 1990 Reatta

full exhaust
3" intake cone
Delco Ignition upgrade
RapidFire #14 plugs
Underdrive pulley
GM Tuners chip

I have had the car tuned but with a increase in WOT timing i am not getting any knock

Ryan at GM tuners says there is a possiblity to pass your peak performance and not get knock. I was wondering how many degrees advance you guyz were running in you cars
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 10:26 PM
  #3  
2seater's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
2seater is on a distinguished road
Default

Ask Ryan to look at the figures he has on the Fastchips I sent him to get started on my turbo chip. The Fastchips had extra timing added beyond their normal premium fuel chip settings, as a matter of fact I sent it back and had more timing added twice. He sent me the timing chart for it but of course I can't find it now. It even worked well without knock on 93 octane after I had increased the compression ratio to 9.1:1. I think the figure is a lot more than 24*. I was also running a 160* thermostat, and it liked lots of timing. Ask him to look up Hal'* or 2seaters chip.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #5  
2seater's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
2seater is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jr's3800
Very interesting...

I run 87 Octane, I have never seen any KR on it... I have always figgured that these cars could use a bit more timming...

And aren't you the guy that used L27 pistons for a 9.1 to 1 compression rating?

And I know I am off topic, but what was the diffrence in the dish between the LN3 and L27 Pistons...

And how does the compression relate to timming advance?
Yeah, I am the guy. The vin L pistons I used measured 30 cc in the dish. The original pistons were 26cc, but were .050" shorter compression height. The new pistons are flush with the deck to about .002" above. The reason I mentioned compression was the flame front travels faster with higher pressure, somewhat offset by higher octane fuel.

Before I got with the program to increase performance, I would sometimes see 1-2 degrees of knock retard at the shift points running 87 octane and the engine stock, save for a cone intake filter. I think GM did a pretty good job optimizing the stock setup.

I saw the comment about getting to the point of too much timing, and that is possible. The conventional wisdom is to set the timing to get the best trap speed rather than the quickest e.t., it is safer. You really need to experiment with what works best with a particular combination once you start modifying. Most aftermarket chips do offer some improvement, but will usually be safe, rather than optimized for your particular combination. Ryan is a good guy to work with and I recommend him highly.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2006 | 03:55 PM
  #6  
maybe2fast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Walled Lake, MI
maybe2fast is on a distinguished road
Default

I will ask him to look up the timing he used. also good info on the L27 pistons!!!

he said timing is around 3-4 degrees above stock
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hans
2000-2005
23
Sep 11, 2007 12:14 AM
dillcc
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
17
Oct 23, 2006 05:13 AM
95naSTA
1992-1999
0
Sep 15, 2005 10:35 PM
bmsgaffer86
General GM Chat
8
Jan 3, 2004 12:33 PM
Allmachtige
1992-1999
4
Oct 20, 2002 03:16 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 AM.