Hmm...maybe it'* just me and the fact that I find that most people driving a Caddy drive at a nice, steady twenty under the speed limit, but although it'* a okay looking car...taking that over the Aurora? personally, I'd stick with the Aurora because (even as much as I tease about it) it'* a really nice looking car

Thanks Jeanie...I need to hear that today!

*sigh* failing brakes on 50 mph roads will make you think about other cars. STS is nice tho. To be honest I prefer the newer ones.

I'll keep the Rora,

Not to hijack your thread Johnny....I have to ask, where did your friend pony up the dough for a 2000 STS?

When I was shopping for Greenzilla, the only other cars on my list were STS'*. 2 of them were black. I found Greenzilla at the last minute.

Yikes, that'* scary about the breaks! I can understand the motivation to want to get another car... :? Stay safe out there...that'* just scary stuff.

the only problem is the amount of problems he'* had! they bought it in may of 2003 and only have 40,000 miles on it. that thing has been in the shop more than 1/2 a dozen times since! :?

his question was how he got the money for it...

Actually, John, I need to correct you here. We are the owners of the STS, and we haven't had that many problems with it. There'* been a few little problems they've taken care of on oil changes, but nothing major. We bought it used (and used cars someitmes have little things that have been broken by the previous owner, etc.) in November 2002, with 25,000 miles on it, on trade for our 2002 Maxima, for $30,000. It'* been an awesome car. And yes, its been in the shop 1/2 a dozen times for oil changes...

Great looking pics.

I don't mean anything by what I said, John. I just don't want people to get the wrong idea about the car. (BTW, we're good friends everyone.)

ECT= 2 door
SLS= 4door slightly less equiped
STS= 4door full package.