Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

Scanning results

Old May 21, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
jshelton54's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
jshelton54 is on a distinguished road
Default Scanning results

Here are the results I have had with scanning and some tuning. I am still getting a lot of KR even with all my mods including headers, rockers, CAI, 180 drilled t-stat, 104s, and a 3.4". I know others with the same setup are seeing 0 KR. We have been adding fuel and this was with race fuel in the car. What does everyone think? Where should I go from here?

Scan #1 without tuning:


Scan #6 after tuning some:
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #2  
ssewannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
ssewannabe is on a distinguished road
Default

Sorry I can't help with your question. I was just wondering what scan tool you used to get your results? Thanks.

Dave
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #3  
OLDsman105's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: New York City
OLDsman105 is on a distinguished road
Default

I noticed that you LTFT went to zero. Was that with the race fuel or do you have a tuner?
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #4  
McGrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
From: Wickliffe, Ohio
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

Try to lean your fueling out some; I think you'll see better power around 11.5:1
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #5  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Jared... Your ECT should be Engine Coolant Temp. Why is this saying you aren't up to operating temps before testing/tuning?

You'll want to have the car up to temp. It does appear that you have a lot of KR for the mods. When was the last time you changed plugs and the gap you used?
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #6  
agrazela's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
agrazela is on a distinguished road
Default

Bill, those temps (IAT, ECT) are clearly in degrees C. Plugs and gap is good advice...jshelton, how well mechanically tuned is this car? Maybe a Seafoam or other induction cleaning is in order...

McGrath, he'* making better power in the second scan than in the first...though I agree that second scan is, IMO, a bit rich.

Your basic choices as I see it are to richen further (which I wouldn't recommend if this tune is for a daily driver), or pull spark timing.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #7  
1993 SLE's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 1
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by agrazela

Your basic choices as I see it are to richen further (which I wouldn't recommend if this tune is for a daily driver), or pull spark timing.
actually some times when the car is running TOO rich it will cause KR... McGrath is right on with the 11:5 AFR

and looking at the scans the car has some weird AFR espically at the Higher RPMS. I thing that you need to get the L67 Pump in the car, as its a 2 stager, where as your L36 is not.

you need to adress your fueling first, then start tuning the car
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #8  
jshelton54's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
jshelton54 is on a distinguished road
Default

getting L67 fuel pump to see if this solves the issues. Already on it'* way.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #9  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Originally Posted by agrazela
Bill, those temps (IAT, ECT) are clearly in degrees C.
Hmmm I guess looking at it more comprehensively would show that.
Why we are looking at Celsius instead of Faren..is beyond me.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
2000SilverBullet's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
2000SilverBullet is on a distinguished road
Default

Why we are looking at Celsius instead of Faren..is beyond me.
Because it is a more logical unit of temperature and it'* the Canadian way, eh.

I know you're behind me on that one Bill........................way behind me.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 PM.