Roads still too wet to TRY it out but it sure looks cool.

Sweet, I need to get me one of those for the street, my 3.2 is little small for daily driver.

What size belt you put on with it?

It'* in my signature below.

I thought you already had one Taylor. :?

Why is the 3.2 too small for you on the street? I would have thought that with your 1.9 rockers, it wouldn't be.

I have a 3.2 for the track.

Well my last scan with the 3.4 on I still saw blip of 2-3 KR. :? New PCM going in with fans at 160 tomarrow and want to scan again when I get a case learn. I don't like the idea of having any KR on the street. so the 3.4 is staying of for now. Todd had the same problem couldn't run a 3.2 with no kr like GP'* can untill it was cammed.

will be running a 3.2 at the track though. Going in on Friday and will just run race gas for the weekend, try to get it scanned too but thats a maybe, than the 3.4 is going back on with a new belt,

Any reason why a bonnie could not run same size pulley as a GP? Also would this ony apply to newer gen bonnies, or my 97 SSEI as well?

I'm leaning towards just the +2k bonnies, but all cars/engines act different. All comes down to the tolarances of how everything was made/assambled that day, just my opinion, explans the factory freeks too.

Looks great paul! Looks like rain for a few weeks though :?

6PK1815 SC Belt
its in his sig btw

is that pulley a lot wider than the belt? does it have some room for play in it? its hard to tell from the pic

97-03 GP PCMs are very different then 00+ Bonneville ones, the bonneville is more limiting, but many issues are being resolved by rogue with every new burn.

Side note = the 04+ GTP chips are VERY limiting.They go well above 300HP with Intense'* help.

Yes it is wider than the belt. About one groove on either side of the original belt. The front spacing needs to be wider to accommodate mounting it with the 5 screws to the press on bushing.
It`* a lot lighter, so less rotational inertia.

.....I just may be after that new INTENSE burn too.