New front 'log' type mani for ser 2
06-08-2006, 07:12 PM
#11
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Originally Posted by 95naSTA
Originally Posted by willwren
I'd like to see ZZP'* idea enhanced to a more extreme angle as the 1,3, and 5 meet the collector, rather than almost perpendicular to the collector itself.
It just doesn't look very well thought-out from a flow perspective. It'* as if only diameters of runners and collectors were considered.
06-08-2006, 09:33 PM
#12
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didn't someone flow test the stock manifolds and find that the rear actually flowed worse then the front? Did we ever get confirmation on that?
I wouldn't be too worried about the pipe orientation, they are not meant to be headers and the price reflects that. Stock manifolds are usually set up this way.
-T
I wouldn't be too worried about the pipe orientation, they are not meant to be headers and the price reflects that. Stock manifolds are usually set up this way.
-T
06-08-2006, 10:26 PM
#13
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: August 07 COTM....NEBF '06, CEBF '06 OHMM '06 ONBF '07 CEBF '07
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Keith
Didn't someone flow test the stock manifolds and find that the rear actually flowed worse then the front? Did we ever get confirmation on that?
I wouldn't be too worried about the pipe orientation, they are not meant to be headers and the price reflects that. Stock manifolds are usually set up this way.
-T
I wouldn't be too worried about the pipe orientation, they are not meant to be headers and the price reflects that. Stock manifolds are usually set up this way.
-T
http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/...19&highlight=A
06-09-2006, 12:59 AM
#14
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuelforthesoul1999
Originally Posted by T-Keith
Didn't someone flow test the stock manifolds and find that the rear actually flowed worse then the front? Did we ever get confirmation on that?
I wouldn't be too worried about the pipe orientation, they are not meant to be headers and the price reflects that. Stock manifolds are usually set up this way.
-T
I wouldn't be too worried about the pipe orientation, they are not meant to be headers and the price reflects that. Stock manifolds are usually set up this way.
-T
http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/...19&highlight=A
New #'* are:
SII front cast iron:
Pre port/ceramic: 256 CFM
Post port/Ceramic: 288 CFM
SII Rear tubular:
Pre port/ceramic: 302 CFM
Post Port/Ceramic: 322 CFM
Now the interesting part is to get one of ZZP'* and have it flow tested on the same machine. HMMM.
06-09-2006, 08:17 AM
#15
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montevideo, MN MWBF '05, '06, '07 WCBF '06 '07 survivor
Posts: 3,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe on your mod weekend I should just try the front pem. then race Sat night. Would it be a benefit to have both sides flowing the same rate (or closer together)?
06-09-2006, 08:32 AM
#16
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS
Expert Gearhead
Originally Posted by OLBlueEyesBonne
That'd be me. I just got finished SII PEMS flow tested and it turns out that the #'* were backwards. :(
But he doesn't need a better flowing manifold.
