Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)
View Poll Results: Which is the better performer all around?
3800 SC V6
87.50%
4.0 Aurora V8
12.50%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

L36 vs L67 vs 4.0 V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2005, 09:56 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
 
marquette97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
marquette97 is on a distinguished road
Default

so would you consider the 4.0 V8 to be fun to drive at all? The gas mileage isn't very impressive i know that.
Old 12-17-2005, 09:59 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
1993 SLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

yes on the highway the 4.0 is quite nice
Old 12-17-2005, 10:04 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
 
marquette97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
marquette97 is on a distinguished road
Default

gosh i just don't know. The L67 sound like a much better engine because it is faster AND gets better mileage. How is the L67 when it gets up into the 55-75 mph range?
Old 12-17-2005, 11:40 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
1993 SLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by marquette97
gosh i just don't know. The L67 sound like a much better engine because it is faster AND gets better mileage. How is the L67 when it gets up into the 55-75 mph range?
the L67 tends to fall flat on its face in the upper RPMS..... you will get the 2nd gear kickdown on the highway but its not a high reving motor
Old 12-17-2005, 11:43 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Jim W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

Dood, seriously go drive both cars, its the only way you will get a proper idea of what the cars can do.

If you dont know what a 4.0 gets in mileage, dont assume. I've seen 36.9 mpg in my 4.0, and average 28-30 mpg on the highway. 18 average in the city.
Old 12-17-2005, 11:49 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
 
marquette97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
marquette97 is on a distinguished road
Default

yea you're right, i just don't have any 2001-2003 auroras or L67 ssei'* around here to drive. Anything must be faster than my 1991 3.1LV6 Cutlass Supreme :(
Old 12-18-2005, 03:25 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Jason1351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jason1351 is on a distinguished road
Default

I had a 3.1 in my 93 GP and it sucked! It had some torque off the line but past 40' feet, nothing. As for the Trailblazer with 270 (joke) hp, cousin has one and think'* he'* the ****. He ran a 17.14 at Milan and got laughed at. The 4.0 would stomp it! Anyone who say'* different hasn't raced it against anything but a stock 90hp Civic!
Old 12-18-2005, 12:06 PM
  #38  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

No offense whatsoever intended for my highly-respected Admin buddy, BUT....

I've probably driven more Bonnevilles modded and stock than anyone here. And I've also driven 3 auroras and 2 GXP'*. I've also owned a Northstar at one point myself.

And I'd have to give the stock for stock edge to the L67 OFF THE LINE.
Stock for stock edge to the Aurora ABOVE 90mph, but who drives like that?

Now considering the lack of a good aftermarket for the Aurora, the modding isn't really a fair comparison, but it'* VERY easy to mod the L67 to beat the Aurora all-around. Mild mods and the L67 is gone.

On top of that, the L67 tends to be more bulletproof (years of experience with the 3800 prove this), while the Northstar family tends to have some gray areas for reliability. These are issues you can fix, but they are issues nonetheless.

The L67 is more forgiving to work on, and should be cheaper to maintain in the long run. Particularly when you factor in gas mileage.
Old 12-18-2005, 06:36 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Jim W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

We can banter back and forth about how good each engine is, and where they offer plus and minuses. The 3800 is a good engine for wrenching, and modification, if thats is your game, and yes with gobs of torque it offers that off the line advantage.

I to have driven many a 3800, everything from 8-Ball to a stock LN3 powered 89 SE, a few GP'* here and a 01 Regal GS. For my perspective nothing has offered a better overall driving experience then that funny looking white car down there

But we are all biased arent we!
Old 12-18-2005, 06:48 PM
  #40  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Jim W
that funny looking white car down there

But we are all biased arent we!
HA! We agree on something!

Now get a stock spoiler on that thing. They look badass on the Rora'*.


Quick Reply: L36 vs L67 vs 4.0 V8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.