JUST MAY NOT NEED A LSD
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 1
From: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
think about all the $$$ they put into that. If it was a vette that they started with think about how much faster it would be.
'vette+blower=invincible
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 1
Yeah you will scare the bejeezus outta them, and anyone in hearing distance of this beast (abuot 1 mile).
I think a corvette z06 is a great car, and it'* great at the track. It does weight less then many 502 etc powered v8 monsters but meh....
I think a corvette z06 is a great car, and it'* great at the track. It does weight less then many 502 etc powered v8 monsters but meh....
Guest
Posts: n/a
what really shocked me was that the vette only had a 60' time of 1.856 secs
he even had drag radials on it too
i do have a question though:
i used my G TECH pro comp on the first 2 runs as a data recorder.
my times were very very close to what i ran on the track{ 60' was withing 3-5 thousands and 1/4 time was within2 hundredths}
i know i was running into fuel starvation and KR due to running lean, my torque showed 462 lb/ft on the first and 467lb/ft on the second. all in by 1850 rpms. and the HP was low, 180 and 183 at 4300. would the slicks make that much difference in the torque readings due to a harder launch?
he even had drag radials on it too
i do have a question though:
i used my G TECH pro comp on the first 2 runs as a data recorder.
my times were very very close to what i ran on the track{ 60' was withing 3-5 thousands and 1/4 time was within2 hundredths}
i know i was running into fuel starvation and KR due to running lean, my torque showed 462 lb/ft on the first and 467lb/ft on the second. all in by 1850 rpms. and the HP was low, 180 and 183 at 4300. would the slicks make that much difference in the torque readings due to a harder launch?
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jeffrey10x2
what really shocked me was that the vette only had a 60' time of 1.856 secs
he even had drag radials on it too
i do have a question though:
i used my G TECH pro comp on the first 2 runs as a data recorder.
my times were very very close to what i ran on the track{ 60' was withing 3-5 thousands and 1/4 time was within2 hundredths}
i know i was running into fuel starvation and KR due to running lean, my torque showed 462 lb/ft on the first and 467lb/ft on the second. all in by 1850 rpms. and the HP was low, 180 and 183 at 4300. would the slicks make that much difference in the torque readings due to a harder launch?
he even had drag radials on it too
i do have a question though:
i used my G TECH pro comp on the first 2 runs as a data recorder.
my times were very very close to what i ran on the track{ 60' was withing 3-5 thousands and 1/4 time was within2 hundredths}
i know i was running into fuel starvation and KR due to running lean, my torque showed 462 lb/ft on the first and 467lb/ft on the second. all in by 1850 rpms. and the HP was low, 180 and 183 at 4300. would the slicks make that much difference in the torque readings due to a harder launch?
