Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

I've got issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #1  
sandrock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 1
From: In your garage, swipin' da lug nutz
sandrock is on a distinguished road
Default I've got issues

...which is to be expected. I took the SSEi on a fairly decent drive yesterday, and since this issue came up http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/...121&highlight= , and correcting it, I have had some massive loss in power. Boost often dumps, and I rarely hit my max boost. So far, here are my findings through the scantool:

IAT: It climbs all the way up to 140ish. The sensor is located close to the exhaust crossover, which I know is NOT the ideal place for it. I'm going to reloc it, but how just how much of an effect does the IAT have on fuel maps?

Temp: Yeah, that climbs too. 220ish. Been looking in the FSM for the spot to tap into for a happy switch, and I think I found the spot...in the 93 FSM book 2, page 6E3-a-9, it appears GC3 is the place to tap to ground. Is that the spot for those that are running the overide? I used to just turn on the AC, but now that it all leaked out (fairwell ice cold R12), the fans wont come on unless the compressor kicks in, which it doesn't.

BCS: Appears to work as it should...up at idle, down when snapping the throttle. Funny thing though...the FSM states that it bypasses when put in reverse, which makes sense. Mine doesn't. Which leads me to think the system is flaky.

Also, my tensioner is a bit on the weak side. As a temporary measure, I put on a smaller belt, though not by much. Will this cause sc slippage?

EDIT - This is a bit of P&B, Forced Induction, and 92-99 all in one. Mods feel free to move to the most appropriate spot, wherever that may be

EDIT 2 - Found part of the problem...silly me didn't swap the MAFs back between the models. What a difference that made
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #2  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Special delivery on it'* way
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #3  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

That MAF sensor is going to be a BIG factor. You were running way lean, which was also causing your coolant temp problems to a degree. Relocate that IAT. There'* at least another 10 degrees of timing.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
sandrock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 1
From: In your garage, swipin' da lug nutz
sandrock is on a distinguished road
Default

I put everything back the way it was prior to swapping bits and pieces around. My boost came back Scanned for other little tidbits, and only saw 1 KS during the entire drive.

I will be relocating the IAT to the outside of the engine bay on my next work break. I am still going to do the fan bypass as well. But does anyone know what the BCS is supposed to act like when in reverse? My books say one thing, and the car is doing something else.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LoudLowNslow
1992-1999
3
May 8, 2008 12:51 PM
MOS95B
Lounge
14
Dec 23, 2004 11:15 PM
dbtk2
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
4
Apr 5, 2004 12:26 AM
OLBlueEyesBonne
Lounge
10
Jan 10, 2004 12:17 AM
BonneAlien
Your Ride: GM Pictures & Videos
24
Aug 15, 2003 07:00 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.