Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

It's time... 2000 Impala LS build up

Old Jul 28, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #1  
petraman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 0
From: Granville, Ohio ~NEBF '07 Survivor~
petraman is on a distinguished road
Default It'* time... 2000 Impala LS build up

Yes, that'* right. I miss my boost... Now that I have an actual income (haha), I'm planing on building up my Impala. The first thing I'm doing is going with an Intense tranny rebuild, not sure of the options yet. After that, I'd LIKE to do an L67 top end swap, but I guess I'm still up in the air with the other two options (N/A, turbo). I'd like to be around 300 WHP when I'm done, so it'* enough to stand out, but it won't diminish the daily driver aspect. So here'* my list as of now; any opinions would be awesome:
L67 Top Swap (ported as best I can)
FWI
MPS (Probably would start with the 3.2)
Gatorback belt
180 tstat
Yella Terra Roller Rockers
3" Downpipe with O2 simulator and highflow cat
Pacesetter Headers
SLP Exhaust
Stage 2 Heads and Cam down the road

Keep in mind, this won't be overnight. This will probably be a 1-3 year project.

Now, what options do you think I should go with for the tranny rebuild, keeping that in mind?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
McGrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
From: Wickliffe, Ohio
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

I think you should decide if you are doing a top swap or L67 swap or doing a turbo before you plan a transmission. I don't like the idea of boosting a L36 do to the weaker rods I just don't think it would hold up as something with L67 rods or even better L32 rods would.

But you can always get the FWI & headers before hand since those will be used no which route you choose.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #3  
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: plattsburgh NY
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Well first if you get headers then they will be a waste if you go turbo, so figure that out.

Next i LOL at your comment about a 3.2 pulley. If you are top swapping then sorry but even with those mods a 3.2 is way too small for the high compression L36 bottom. If you want to run a 3.2 you better think a cam and probably atleast a SS IC. Or else i would think maybe a 3.8 or you MIGHT be abkle to get away with a 3.5 with a good tune and stuff.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #4  
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: plattsburgh NY
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Any also if you go headers then you dont need a 3 inch downpipe.

And the SLP exhaust is more for sound then anything. You would be in more better shape spending that money to more mods that will help you FLOW then the exhaust.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 04:41 PM
  #5  
oldsrocket's Avatar
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
oldsrocket is on a distinguished road
Default

hey mcrgrath

some of the worlds most powerfull 3800s are made with the l36 bottom end

look up ZZ Performance

they will tell you
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #6  
McGrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
From: Wickliffe, Ohio
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

Ha, yeah a tubro and standard headers wouldn't work very well together

Originally Posted by oldsrocket
some of the worlds most powerfull 3800s are made with the l36 bottom end
I'm not debating the amount of power it could make. I'm speaking of reliability, this isn't going to be a track queen we are talking about a street car that won't be torn down and looked over all the time.

Ed
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #8  
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: plattsburgh NY
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jr's3800
A swap seems like a good choice..
cough i agree and take your own advice cough
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #9  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Pete...before you decide whether to top swap, turbo or L67 swap. Talk to your local performance guys. I haven't seen them steer anyone wrong yet.

When my lower end checked out.. I made some calls and was talked out of the L36 bottom end for reliability on a DD

As for the rear O2 sim..why? Currently Caspers is dealing with the government on them and it'* an issue. I run a rear O2 with no troubles.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #10  
OLDsman105's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: New York City
OLDsman105 is on a distinguished road
Default

I would talk to intense about a turbo and a built tranny if i was in your postion.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.