I wanna go fast. (Performance Buildup)
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
It couldn't hurt to throw on a new coupler and change the */C oil. The ones from ZZP and Intense are better than OEM anyway.
Mods/Admins, out of respect for Han'* topic, should this one be split off into its own topic?
Mods/Admins, out of respect for Han'* topic, should this one be split off into its own topic?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Originally Posted by willwren
Port match the SC to the LIM? I've never heard of that. It seems to me that it'* not necessary, considering the outlet of the SC is so much smaller than the inlet of the LIM, and it just blows in there.
whoops..typo.
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
I bought pretty much the same engine modifications as you less the upgraded pcm and ran 14.57@95.9 with 2.35 60' time. My car is easily capable of 14.3'* for sure with the right traction. This was all with full interior as i drive it on the street. with the pcm you are looking at a very low 14 second car. good luck
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
whooohooo
Security gaurd emailed me and let me know my package was here and needed to be signed for.
I really want to leave early from work today to jump on it but I have an enormous workload at the moment and if I dont get it done today i'll have to do it tomorrow and/or sunday
Security gaurd emailed me and let me know my package was here and needed to be signed for.
I really want to leave early from work today to jump on it but I have an enormous workload at the moment and if I dont get it done today i'll have to do it tomorrow and/or sunday
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Wouldn't the adjusted fuel tables of an Intense PCM be rather important (and beneficial) with a 3.4 pulley? I would have done the PCM first instead of the 3.4 or done them at the same time. I intend this as a question mostly, but it makes sense to me.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Car is up and running. Seeing a bit of KR though across the board, maximum of 3.7* of KR at about 94MPH. 2* at the 1-2 shift, Replaced the fuel filter and running thru some injector cleaner right now, I imagine I will need to replace the fuel pump and get the injectors flowmatched, along with replacing the (original) cat converter (173K). I'm pretty sure its leaning out or has an exhaust restriction that needs to be addressed, and if its exhaust I'm pointing toward that rusted cat.
but holy sh** is the car fast
but holy sh** is the car fast
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
KR is 0* at 55 *F outside. previous numbers were 75* to 80* outside temp.
I think the high altitude may be generating KR which would not been seen at sea level. :?
I think the high altitude may be generating KR which would not been seen at sea level. :?