Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

Hans's Buildup.....Going Fast Without Spending Too Much....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #21  
Hans's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Hans is on a distinguished road
Default

I dont see how I would get a cam in the car without pulling the motor... :?:
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 12:55 AM
  #22  
McGrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
From: Wickliffe, Ohio
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

Here is a link to a thread with a bunch of pics from when Rogue installed his S1X with the motor in his car.

Ed
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 06:19 AM
  #23  
Hans's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Hans is on a distinguished road
Default

It looks to me like it might be easier to pull the motor? probably take the exhaust manifolds off at that time as well I'm guessing. pull the motor out as a whole and then do the springs and cam at the same time.......at least if its in my garage type of project.

I'm still deciding between a cam and 1.9s....hard to tell if its a huge difference between the two based on track times though.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 06:26 AM
  #24  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

There is a good difference. Cam changes the duration and lift, where the rockers only change the lift.

It is fairly easy to do the swap in the car with a few jack stands and a floor jack. Us poor 92-99'* pretty much have no support on that side of the car (why mine wears a bra) and I found it easier to pull the motor.

Having done rockers and springs on a few cars now, it'* easy in the car and slighty easier out of the car. The key there is having a helper and a magnet. While you change valve seals, the helper gets the new spring compressed for install.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 06:32 AM
  #25  
Hans's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Hans is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm not too concerned about running 12s actually. I may go back to the orginal plan of rockers like several other members here (shadd, bullet, p-dad, jshelton, etc) and be happy with mid 13s. I have rode in Jared'* and Paul'* cars recently and was plenty happy with the performance.

rockers look like they would take me a few hours were a cam may take me days and I may screw something up

I'm thinking 105# springs should suit me just fine? Anyone see any problems with them or are they just a "waste of money" if I dont plan on a cam?

With $5 a gallon gas next year I'm a bit concerend about a cam reducing my economy to 27 vs 30mpg with rockers
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #26  
Rogue's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 1
From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi
Rogue is on a distinguished road
Default

105# are fine to run with rockers if they are in your budget.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #27  
2000SilverBullet's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
2000SilverBullet is on a distinguished road
Default

My 90 lb springs work fine up to 6200 rpm and don't put as much stress or wear on my stock cam and timing chain.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #28  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Are those LS6?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #29  
Hans's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Hans is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by BillBoost37
Are those LS6?
Yes....

what addtional wear will 105s cause? I want the most reliable choice here guys....6000RPM is probably all I will take the car for now with rockers.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #30  
jshelton54's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Meridian, ID
jshelton54 is on a distinguished road
Default

I understood that the 90lbs put more stress on the timing chain dampener because of the increased rate of compression. Doesn't seem intuitive but if you see the math it actually makes sense. I run the 105# springs FWIW. I know intense runs the LS6s without any issues for a long time now. Heck you saw my results with rockers. I didn't think low 13s was too bad with my Gen III.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.