Gut a 87-91 airbox?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 28, 2006 | 03:36 PM

#11

wjcollier07

Thread Starter

Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 0

Likes: 0

also, have you ever heard of anyone running without an air filter? one of my friends does that, i keep telling him, that really is not a good idea....but he has run like that for like 2000 miles..he said he gets better performance...whacko

Mar 28, 2006 | 03:39 PM

#12

BillBoost37

DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 41,391

Likes: 30

From: Enfield, CT

BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light

He'd get about the same performance from a K&N. He'll pull something through soon that will cause damage.

Mar 28, 2006 | 03:41 PM

#13

wjcollier07

Thread Starter

Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 0

Likes: 0

i am gonna laugh soo hard when the one day i don't see him driving, hes gonna tell me he killed his intake cause something big got in there...or it will be something stupid like he will get a leaf on the MAF sensor blocking it and he will stall..HAA that will be SOOO funny!!@@$#$@!

Mar 28, 2006 | 03:43 PM

#14

banned3800

Guest

Posts: n/a

The 87-91 Box is really not restrictive... But the intake I stuck on mine sure did seem to help the low end torque, and just made the car more dirveable...LOL

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

Mar 28, 2006 | 03:58 PM

#15

lash

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 7,030

Likes: 2

From: Central Florida

There'* really no engine, NA or not that, can't benefit from better air throughput. That'* what the SC is all about, after all. Of course at some point you have to improve the rest of the throughput restrictions.