Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)
View Poll Results: WHich one is better and why???
Gutted Airbox
20.83%
Fenderwell Intake
79.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Which is better and why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 08:46 PM
  #31  
agrazela's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
agrazela is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by 95naSTA
You could log the maf values and rpm at WOT, plot them, and see which has a more useable area.
$$ is the problem though...
I just got a scantool, and I'm planning to screw around with intakes. Please elaborate on this...

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #32  
95naSTA's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 2
From: Philly
95naSTA is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by agrazela
I just got a scantool, and I'm planning to screw around with intakes. Please elaborate on this...

Thanks.
Your scantool should have a flow rate value for the maf sensor. This will tell you how much air is coming into the engine. You'll need to record/log this and rpm at WOT.
For consistency, do pulls in the same gear, make sure your air intake temps, engine operating temps, etc. are in the same range and test one right after the other so the humidity is the same.
If you plot the maf flow rate vs time for both setups you can not only see which intake has higher peak flow but also which has more area under the curve.
You may just want to concentrate on the area 3k or so and above since you only below that rpm once in a race.
Note that different types of filters as well as how clean they are will effect the results.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #33  
agrazela's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
agrazela is on a distinguished road
Default

95naSTA,

Thanks for the info. I did some web searching myself after posting my question, and I think I've got a handle on calculating volumetric efficiencies now.

I intend to compare VE'* (5 reps under each test condition) at WOT at about 4000 rpm on my otherwise nearly stock 98 LeSabre with:
    Reply
    Old Jan 28, 2007 | 01:08 AM
      #34  
    95naSTA's Avatar
    Senior Member
    True Car Nut
     
    Joined: Feb 2003
    Posts: 4,508
    Likes: 2
    From: Philly
    95naSTA is on a distinguished road
    Default

    You should really do it over an rpm range.
    If you could, would you try just gutting the front part of the air box and then try fully gutting it? I've always wondered if keeping the rear part in smoothed it out enough to benefit flow.
    Reply
    Old Jan 28, 2007 | 01:10 AM
      #35  
    agrazela's Avatar
    Senior Member
    Posts like a Corvette
     
    Joined: Jan 2007
    Posts: 1,451
    Likes: 0
    From: San Diego, CA
    agrazela is on a distinguished road
    Default

    Funny you should say that...I have the same exact idea. I soon will have two airboxes, and can mix and match halves as I wish. I will be testing that.
    Reply
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    Mattster
    1987-1991
    1
    Jul 16, 2007 07:22 PM
    rrounds
    2000-2005
    18
    Mar 3, 2004 12:39 PM
    SSEimatt93
    Your Ride: GM Pictures & Videos
    17
    Feb 21, 2004 10:33 AM
    bonnie94ssei
    Lounge
    36
    Sep 25, 2003 04:53 AM




    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.