All Series 1 L67's equal? Or close? PICS ADDED
05-20-2006, 04:04 PM
#12
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Farmington, Minnesota =MWBF '05 SURVIVOR= =CEBF '06 SURVIVOR= =August '06 COTM=
Posts: 9,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
For clarification it was Fake Canadian and Morty. The alien wasn't here yet.
??????????
05-20-2006, 05:27 PM
#13
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: All Series 1 L67'* equal? Or close? Hmmmm....
Originally Posted by willwren
1992 SSEi, salvaged by BillBoost and Pat
.
Originally Posted by LakevilleSSEi
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
For clarification it was Fake Canadian and Morty. The alien wasn't here yet.
??????????
05-20-2006, 05:45 PM
#14
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, _______Canada._______ West Coast Bonneville Fest ___05,06,07 Survivor___
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the LIM i ported and am currently running on my car is from a 94 SSEi.
05-20-2006, 06:12 PM
#16
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, _______Canada._______ West Coast Bonneville Fest ___05,06,07 Survivor___
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, im not to sure Pat. Both LIM'* look really identical. Only difference was i had to remove all the sensors from my 93 my LIM and screw them into the 94 LIM as the 94 sensors have different pins in them.
Physically from what i remember, they were identical.
Physically from what i remember, they were identical.
05-21-2006, 12:11 AM
#17
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 1995 intake on my car has an additional sensor that screws on top of the intake. When I replaced all the sensors, the dealer did not have a part number and not even a picture of the location of the sensor. However, I have a picture with the location of this sensor from AllData.
05-21-2006, 12:53 AM
#18
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Joe, I have two 95 L67 intakes here. One in the SLE, the other in my lap. I have a total of 2 sensors in each. Both ECT'*. And both are in the identical locations of my 93 LIM and the 92 LIM I have sitting next to me on the floor.
05-23-2006, 07:16 AM
#20
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Starting with the crack in the 95 LIM. This was likely the death of the car. Note in the pics farther down that one of the ECT sensors was removed and a plug inserted. This MIGHT be a Riviera only thing, as this was originally from a 95 Buick Riviera:
After cleaning:
On to the design differences.......
95:
92 (very similar to 93):
95:
92:
Pic showing that both ECT sensor locations are identical:
Note in this pic that the 95 Riviera manifold has one ECT sensor removed and plugged, but the thread pattern and location are identical to all 4 manifolds I currrently have here.
Runner length isn't much of an issue on a Supercharged motor, particularly when you're talking the diffeence between 2" or 3". Not a significant change. The net effect of the 'chambering' on the 95 manifold could be negative or positive on horsepower and/or torque depending on how the air reacts in the manifold. My personal preference would be to have the spaces between the ports on the 95 manifold SOLID. Close the door in a sense so the air would be forced to go to the ports rather than eddy around.
Now I'd really love to see a 94 manifold. I have all the other bases covered. I'd also like a couple 94 L67'* to read the part number on the LIM below the nosedrive of the SC and post it here. It may be easier to read with a little bit of water smeared on it.
After cleaning:
On to the design differences.......
95:
92 (very similar to 93):
95:
92:
Pic showing that both ECT sensor locations are identical:
Note in this pic that the 95 Riviera manifold has one ECT sensor removed and plugged, but the thread pattern and location are identical to all 4 manifolds I currrently have here.
Runner length isn't much of an issue on a Supercharged motor, particularly when you're talking the diffeence between 2" or 3". Not a significant change. The net effect of the 'chambering' on the 95 manifold could be negative or positive on horsepower and/or torque depending on how the air reacts in the manifold. My personal preference would be to have the spaces between the ports on the 95 manifold SOLID. Close the door in a sense so the air would be forced to go to the ports rather than eddy around.
Now I'd really love to see a 94 manifold. I have all the other bases covered. I'd also like a couple 94 L67'* to read the part number on the LIM below the nosedrive of the SC and post it here. It may be easier to read with a little bit of water smeared on it.