3" exhaust = POWER!!
Ahh, I read what Intense said about them but they're the ones selling it. I guess real world matches up fairly well then. In that case though....
Raises the two questions then:
3" exhaust = power ?
or
Rockers = advertised power ?
Originally Posted by Dans2002bonne
Thats 23 WHP
Originally Posted by 2000SilverBullet
The 1.9 rockers will add 23 whp... alone.
3" exhaust = power ?
or
Rockers = advertised power ?
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
From: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI

Originally Posted by DrJay
Ahh, I read what Intense said about them but they're the ones selling it. I guess real world matches up fairly well then. In that case though....
Raises the two questions then:
3" exhaust = power ?
or
Rockers = advertised power ?
Originally Posted by Dans2002bonne
Thats 23 WHP
Originally Posted by 2000SilverBullet
The 1.9 rockers will add 23 whp... alone.
3" exhaust = power ?
or
Rockers = advertised power ?
Rrounds is also running with a full 3" into dual 3" muffler exhaust and his times are the same as mine and he has less mods.
It doesn't seem to hurt him.
I tend to agree with opening it up as much as you can with our SC engines.
Running open headers would be a little too extreme.
If I ever change my exhaust, I will go with 3" to twin 2 1/2" out.
It doesn't seem to hurt him.
I tend to agree with opening it up as much as you can with our SC engines.
Running open headers would be a little too extreme.
If I ever change my exhaust, I will go with 3" to twin 2 1/2" out.
Do you have dyno numbers to compare? There are a lot of track variables.
I'm kind of interested in this because I'm fast running out of practical things to mod, and the exhaust is next. Mine, although unidentifiable, isn't stock but I'm still curious if 3" or smaller is best...meh
I'm kind of interested in this because I'm fast running out of practical things to mod, and the exhaust is next. Mine, although unidentifiable, isn't stock but I'm still curious if 3" or smaller is best...meh
Originally Posted by 2000SilverBullet
Running open headers would be a little too extreme.
He matched HP gains, but torque is up more then Intense says. Keep in mind those might just be 1.9 rockers, but that'* on a previously modded, Forced induction engine. N/A will see different gains, and non-modded cars will as well.
Originally Posted by dbtk2
Yeah, but that 240/280 is at the engine. You have to take into account the drivetrain loss of approx. 20%. 20% loss of 240hp would be 192whp.
Driveline loss is never a percentage of engine power. It'* a fixed number. No matter how much power your engine makes at the crank, it always takes the same amount of that power to turn the wheels over. If a stock L67 makes 240 hp at the crank and approximately 190-200 hp at the wheels, its a 40 or 50 hp loss through the driveline components. If you up your engine power, it doesn't take any more power to turn the tranny than it did before. Thus a car making 400 hp at the crank would make roughly 355 hp at the wheels. If you used a percentage rule you'd only figure it to be 320 hp, which would be incorrect. Power lost to the driveline is a constant
Lol, yeah I hear you Jay. I always thought in terms of percentage until my buddy Doug from the Thunderbird and Cougar Club of America gave me that revelation one day. I didn't even understand it at first, but it makes sense. Just because you hop up your motor doesn't mean you lose anything more through your driveline!
Originally Posted by big_news_1
Originally Posted by dbtk2
Yeah, but that 240/280 is at the engine. You have to take into account the drivetrain loss of approx. 20%. 20% loss of 240hp would be 192whp.
Driveline loss is never a percentage of engine power. It'* a fixed number. No matter how much power your engine makes at the crank, it always takes the same amount of that power to turn the wheels over. If a stock L67 makes 240 hp at the crank and approximately 190-200 hp at the wheels, its a 40 or 50 hp loss through the driveline components. If you up your engine power, it doesn't take any more power to turn the tranny than it did before. Thus a car making 400 hp at the crank would make roughly 355 hp at the wheels. If you used a percentage rule you'd only figure it to be 320 hp, which would be incorrect. Power lost to the driveline is a constant

Shawn


