Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

3" down pipe or stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
Jack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Jack is on a distinguished road
Default 3" down pipe or stock?

I'm planning on putting in a High flow CAT soon, the question I have is should I go with a 3" down pipe or keep my stock. What are the pros and cons either way?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
ChaseSmith's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Yulee , FL ___ SEBF Survivor
ChaseSmith is on a distinguished road
Default

I put a 3" offroad (no cat) DP on my GTP before I sold it. Still with stock mufflers, the car sounded pretty mean
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #3  
Jack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Jack is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by ChaseSmith
I put a 3" offroad (no cat) DP on my GTP before I sold it. Still with stock mufflers, the car sounded pretty mean
Unfortunately emissions standards require a cat for me :(
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #4  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Where is everyone on this....

I don't think you'd really gain much performance wise from this. Want to hear from the others though.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 04:18 PM
  #5  
McGrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
From: Wickliffe, Ohio
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

I question how much of a gain could be had for any N/A I would think you would lose torque but would make it back up top. But for */C I would guess you could gain more; I've thought long and hard about getting one from hogan performance for myself. But I think tackleing the restrictive manifolds on our cars should come before any DP. I think I'm going to do a high flow cat right now and try to get a set of togs.

Ed
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #6  
MyLittleBlackBird's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 2
MyLittleBlackBird is on a distinguished road
Default

I have no numbers to back this up or disprove anything. That said, I can not see reason to putting a 3" downpipe on a stock or lightly modded L36. I would deffinately keep a cat in there. At most, I would suggest only a 2.5" downpipe, and for a lightly modded(cam, heads, rockers) engine. But this is all just what I think and I have no way to prove or disprove it. I'd leave the 2.25" downpipe and put a single 2.5" exhaust after the cat if it were my car, and I had a cam, heads, rockers, etc. Just my two cents.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #7  
95naSTA's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 2
From: Philly
95naSTA is on a distinguished road
Default

I think you should leave it.
The bonneville DP isn't as restrictive as the GP'*.
If anything take the DP money and put it torwards PEMS.
Just my opinion.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 07:38 AM
  #8  
Jack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Jack is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the feedback, I'd rather save the money for something else if there'* no bennefit from putting one in.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #9  
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: plattsburgh NY
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by 95naSTA
I think you should leave it.
The bonneville DP isn't as restrictive as the GP'*.
If anything take the DP money and put it torwards PEMS.
Just my opinion.
When you took yours off, did you look at it and compare it to the gp downpipe. Are you saying it because the diamteter is bigger or because of the fact of no u bend? Because i am thinking of going power log and rockers, but if i do the rear then i have to do a dp because of the 1995 thing. I would like to see a picture of the gp vs the bonneville dp.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #10  
big_news_1's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, AZ
big_news_1 is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree with Doug and Mike... your stock downpipe is probably fine at this point. After my heads and cam (though they were mild) I still wouldn't put a 3" downpipe on my L36. Like Doug said, I have no numbers to back this up, but I'm thinking a 3" pipe is far too big on an NA motor, unless it is highly modified and spinning up to 6500 rpm. Otherwise you're probably not creating enough exhaust volume to necessitate a big downpipe. It would kill your low end and barely do anything for the upper revs.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.