Are you ready for some football??
12-07-2004, 01:18 AM
#21
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by big_news_1
Packers! Woo hoo!
Oh, uh, wow....... what a game today........ well, you win some, you lose some. Really, really, really lose some...
Oh, uh, wow....... what a game today........ well, you win some, you lose some. Really, really, really lose some...
At least the Bears came through and didnt let the Vikings win.
12-07-2004, 11:28 AM
#23
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Wow, that was some comeback... I feel sorry for Holmgren, being that he'* a permanent fixture in Packers lore. But the 'Boys played their tails off, and how about that onside kick? Couldn't have been executed any more perfectly. Poor coverage by Seattle, but it was still pretty. And then you've got to hand it to that rookie running back for Dallas. Two big clutch runs, one for the winning touchdown. He was a workhorse for 'em.
12-07-2004, 11:41 PM
#24
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Twister97
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
That kick at the end. It had the distance! Just a few feet right, @ 60 yards! 
J/P But I loves my bengals dood! gots to defend!
12-08-2004, 12:18 AM
#25
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Originally Posted by big_news_1
Wow, that was some comeback... I feel sorry for Holmgren, being that he'* a permanent fixture in Packers lore. But the 'Boys played their tails off, and how about that onside kick? Couldn't have been executed any more perfectly. Poor coverage by Seattle, but it was still pretty. And then you've got to hand it to that rookie running back for Dallas. Two big clutch runs, one for the winning touchdown. He was a workhorse for 'em.
12-08-2004, 02:37 AM
#26
Senior Member
True Car Nut
I think you could rule a force out on that one... they didn't even have to review the play. I think the back judge saw that the receiver would have fallen in bounds if it weren't for him landing on the defender'* back and getting knocked out of bounds. Don't you think so? It seemed fairly obvious to me that the defender impeded the trajectory of his landing. Opinions?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post