RX8
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne WY
Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
Theoretically, that engine is supposed to never stop increasing RPM'*. I say "never" quite sparingly, however. That'* a big word. But, as brought out above, 13,000 is quite a bit. But the finer tuned ones can do much more than that now. Rice bike I-4'* can do 13grand.
I think they are a superior design to piston engines, but they never got the R&D that piston engines got, because it was basically only Mazda developing them.
A rotary engine has far, far more potential for performance than a piston engine.
Imagine if GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, BMW, and Mercedes were all trying to compete with Mazda to build a better rotary engine...
If that had happened 35 years ago, we would all look at the piston engine like an antique steam engine. It would be obsolete.
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 2
From: Mississauga, Ontario
it does have downsides, the linked article on here talks about how inefficient they are, thermodynamically.
Sorry for dumbing it down MachoMan
But reminds me of Homer..."Lisssa???" In this house we obey THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS"
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne WY
[quote="89BonnieSE89"]
Yes, that'* true, but Mazda'* been able to overcome the downsides to a large degree. And they're only a small car company. Imagine what the large companies (GM, Ford, Toyota) could have done with their resources.
it does have downsides, the linked article on here talks about how inefficient they are, thermodynamically.
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Salina, KS
Originally Posted by brminder
Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
Theoretically, that engine is supposed to never stop increasing RPM'*. I say "never" quite sparingly, however. That'* a big word. But, as brought out above, 13,000 is quite a bit. But the finer tuned ones can do much more than that now. Rice bike I-4'* can do 13grand.
I think they are a superior design to piston engines, but they never got the R&D that piston engines got, because it was basically only Mazda developing them.
A rotary engine has far, far more potential for performance than a piston engine.
Imagine if GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, BMW, and Mercedes were all trying to compete with Mazda to build a better rotary engine...
If that had happened 35 years ago, we would all look at the piston engine like an antique steam engine. It would be obsolete.
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by L27Buick
this may have been asked or told earlyer but werent the old rx7 not very dependable and they were proned to oil leaks?
It is said, however, that the new motor in the RX-8 has been cured of such problems.
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
either the hydrogen or the hybrid cars would be neat, as long as they remember to keep power. Thats one reason why I wouldnt buy one. That, and maybe make them look like a normal car...
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Cheyenne WY
I just read an article today that the car companies are realizing that their hybrid and hydrogen cars have to have enough power if people are going to buy them.
More powah!
More powah!
