RX-7

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 22, 2007 | 12:36 PM

#21

petraman

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 5,001

Likes: 0

From: Granville, Ohio ~NEBF '07 Survivor~

If I had that kind of money, I'd be looking for a nice, low mileage 97-99 SSEi, but that'* just me.

Jan 22, 2007 | 02:43 PM

#22

Jack

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 3,105

Likes: 0

Don't get me wrong, there'* at least a dozen cars I'd rather have myself, but I wouldn't turn down taking one for a spin. And I wouldn't dis anyone for wanting one

Jan 22, 2007 | 03:32 PM

#23

BonneMeMN

Senior Member

Certified Car Nut

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 15,928

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by petraman

If I had that kind of money, I'd be looking for a nice, low mileage 97-99 SSEi, but that'* just me.

Well to someone who wants a lightweight sports car with a one of a kind engine, a Bonnie doesn't fit the bill at all.

No H body on this club could hang with a late model RX-7 handling-wise.

Jan 22, 2007 | 11:21 PM

#24

repinS

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 5,158

Likes: 0

From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillBoost37

The awesome thing about the rotorary engine is the lack of moving parts. Because you really only have a circular motion and your power is developed in the rpm... spin that baby fast and it'll keep going.

Lack of moving parts yes, but a WHOLE gamut of NON-MOVING parts

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
3 / 3
Next
Last