Quick Question on Digital Cameras
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio

I know I am not done with the users guide yet, but for my new camera it seems that the pictues are a lot clearer then my parrents old 3.2MP (obviously 4.0MP vs. 3.2MP) but for some reason my pictures are always smaller in file size, even on high res, then the sony? I am not saying this is a bad thing, but can someone explain this? The sony usully had a file size of around 1.2mb per pic and the kodak seems to be around .5mb per pic, both on hi-res setting... :? Thanks!
Probably a different JPEG com[pression routine being used. Play with a photoshop program, and you'll notice you can save under different compression rates depending how how much storage you want to use. The quality difference is negligible unless you're really, really picky
That was hard to explain with a hangover....
That was hard to explain with a hangover....
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio

Originally Posted by MOS95B
Probably a different JPEG com[pression routine being used. Play with a photoshop program, and you'll notice you can save under different compression rates depending how how much storage you want to use. The quality difference is negligible unless you're really, really picky
That was hard to explain with a hangover....
That was hard to explain with a hangover....
Originally Posted by 97NAbonneville1
Originally Posted by MOS95B
Probably a different JPEG com[pression routine being used. Play with a photoshop program, and you'll notice you can save under different compression rates depending how how much storage you want to use. The quality difference is negligible unless you're really, really picky
That was hard to explain with a hangover....
That was hard to explain with a hangover....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



