Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

New ride.

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #21  
popatim's Avatar
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 4
From: NY
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

Wow - thats the same HP as my 3.0, no wonder I kept up with one LOL
If I remember right, the 3.8 was dropped after 95 at least int the sable and taurus line.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:25 PM
  #22  
popatim's Avatar
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 4
From: NY
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

LOL heres what the Wiki says about the ford 3.8.. I guess they didn't do too good a 'copy' job!


The Canadian Essex'* origins are controversial. The most commonly cited story is that the Essex is a Ford Windsor V8 engine with two cylinders cut off (similar to what Chevrolet and Chrysler did to make their 4.3 L and 3.9 L V6 designs, respectively), but several important differences between the Windsor'* design and the Essex'* make this implausible. One source states that the Essex is instead a copy of the Buick V6 engine [1], done since Ford needed a working V6 much faster than building one from scratch would take (the Cologne V6 couldn't meet fuel economy requirements, and the all-new Vulcan was several years away from production at that point).
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:29 PM
  #23  
GoldenBullet's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
From: Bloomington, MN
GoldenBullet is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by popatim
LOL heres what the Wiki says about the ford 3.8.. I guess they didn't do too good a 'copy' job!


The Canadian Essex'* origins are controversial. The most commonly cited story is that the Essex is a Ford Windsor V8 engine with two cylinders cut off (similar to what Chevrolet and Chrysler did to make their 4.3 L and 3.9 L V6 designs, respectively), but several important differences between the Windsor'* design and the Essex'* make this implausible. One source states that the Essex is instead a copy of the Buick V6 engine [1], done since Ford needed a working V6 much faster than building one from scratch would take (the Cologne V6 couldn't meet fuel economy requirements, and the all-new Vulcan was several years away from production at that point).
they must've used the ford magic touch, the 3800 was probably too reliable for them
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:30 PM
  #24  
popatim's Avatar
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 4
From: NY
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

AMEN!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Smoof
1992-1999
6
Mar 1, 2006 06:22 PM
JimmyFloyd
Your Ride: GM Pictures & Videos
23
Dec 17, 2005 10:41 AM
miles26
1992-1999
20
Feb 21, 2005 11:44 PM
Allmachtige
1992-1999
5
Jun 18, 2004 03:34 AM
L8RG8R
1992-1999
2
Mar 5, 2003 02:45 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 PM.