Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

Holy CRAP! Rough landing...

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #11  
putertopia's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
putertopia is on a distinguished road
Default

Ah... that makes sense then lol. If it was before early 89, yep.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #12  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

I got out of the Marines in 89. That was my Aviation time.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 05:59 PM
  #13  
popatim's Avatar
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 4
From: NY
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

How sure are you that the pilot didn't just turn out of the wind too soon? Hard to see in the video but it happens right after touchdown.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #14  
GonneVille's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 0
GonneVille is on a distinguished road
Default

Exactly what happened. The pilot turned out just before the gear hit, and the wind blew him too far sideways to correct and still touch down. Had to be a hell of a ride....
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 12:14 AM
  #15  
stwagner's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
stwagner is on a distinguished road
Default

He did the best job he could with those conditons. There'* no way that ATC should have had him landing there. They even said in the video he told ATC to shut down the runway and they routed him to an into the wind runway.

The man in the seat has to do what the man at the computer terminal tells him but you have to know when to tell ATC they're wrong.

He would've had a lot better landing if he rotated a little later. But if you're to far off the runway you COULD have landing gear failure. Would be nice if airbus had gear that swivels to the runway.

Stupid europeans. All hail Boeing. Too bad airbus just got the contract for the Air Force'* new refueler. Guess they need it with the A380 fiasco. Boeing'* 787 is looking like a winner.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 01:17 AM
  #16  
phatklan's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, Illinois
phatklan is on a distinguished road
Default

this is why i dont fly screw that
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 01:55 AM
  #17  
popatim's Avatar
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,957
Likes: 4
From: NY
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by stwagner
He did the best job he could with those conditons. There'* no way that ATC should have had him landing there. They even said in the video he told ATC to shut down the runway and they routed him to an into the wind runway.

The man in the seat has to do what the man at the computer terminal tells him but you have to know when to tell ATC they're wrong.

He would've had a lot better landing if he rotated a little later. But if you're to far off the runway you COULD have landing gear failure. Would be nice if airbus had gear that swivels to the runway.

Stupid europeans. All hail Boeing. Too bad airbus just got the contract for the Air Force'* new refueler. Guess they need it with the A380 fiasco. Boeing'* 787 is looking like a winner.
Thanks. That makes sense to me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator327
Lounge
5
Mar 12, 2008 03:05 PM
Mr Bean
Lounge
9
Sep 22, 2005 09:58 PM
h1081dan
Lounge
28
Nov 4, 2003 09:07 AM
MOS95B
Lounge
5
Oct 26, 2003 12:36 AM
h1081dan
General GM Chat
36
Oct 9, 2003 03:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.