Everyone here, please help do this!
02-08-2004, 12:14 AM
#11
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ab,ca
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm seeing somthings...
The Ls1 engine is running less power then littly moded l67 with that tranny, and are you guys having problems? or huge ammounts of torque steer? although an extra hundred pounds might add to torque steer, but still..
The Ls1 engine is running less power then littly moded l67 with that tranny, and are you guys having problems? or huge ammounts of torque steer? although an extra hundred pounds might add to torque steer, but still..
02-08-2004, 12:16 AM
#12
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Originally Posted by 94Regal
Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Franklly a LS1 Impala won't happen, and I certainly don't demand it. No one is going to pay good money for an Impala SS FWD car, with and LS1. If they want LS1, they'll get a GTO. There would only be an automatic, and it would last you to get it home for the first wash.
I was referring to the 90'* Imp SS as well, the Lt1, 260 HP 330 Lb/ft. Series III L67 is 260 HP and 330lb/ft managed down to 280 by the PCM.
I was referring to the 90'* Imp SS as well, the Lt1, 260 HP 330 Lb/ft. Series III L67 is 260 HP and 330lb/ft managed down to 280 by the PCM.
02-08-2004, 12:20 AM
#13
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Originally Posted by 1992 trofeo
I'm seeing somthings...
The Ls1 engine is running less power then littly moded l67 with that tranny, and are you guys having problems? or huge ammounts of torque steer? although an extra hundred pounds might add to torque steer, but still..
The Ls1 engine is running less power then littly moded l67 with that tranny, and are you guys having problems? or huge ammounts of torque steer? although an extra hundred pounds might add to torque steer, but still..
The LS1 puts out 300/320 at the WHEELS. Now remember we're not talking the beefier H body, we're talking W body!
The idea was to see what kind of real-world horsepower gains we could generate with only a few simple bolt-ons. Enlisting the help of Mike Taylor and his stock ’99 LS1 SS Camaro, we baselined the SS on the Morgan Motorsports chassis dyno in Reseda, California. Initial numbers revealed an impressive 305 hp and 322 lb-ft of torque. Next we plugged in the Hypertech Power Programmer III (PP3) into the data link connector and waited 10 minutes for the non-reformulated gas (non-RFG) tune to upload into the LS1 computer (see sidebar “Gas Is Gas...Right?”). Back on the dyno, we immediately witnessed the horsepower jump to 312 with the new lb-ft figures reading at 328.
02-08-2004, 12:26 AM
#14
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
LS1 is 350 HP.....
Anywho, the L67 has been DYNO'd @ 281 FWTQ by members here, stock. This engine puts out 330lb/ft about when not controlled byt he GM PCM and just hooked up on it'* own. It'* a supercharged V6, give it some credit.
This is my last post in here.
Anywho, the L67 has been DYNO'd @ 281 FWTQ by members here, stock. This engine puts out 330lb/ft about when not controlled byt he GM PCM and just hooked up on it'* own. It'* a supercharged V6, give it some credit.
This is my last post in here.
02-08-2004, 01:11 AM
#16
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Think of the possibilities of having the LS1, stock in a Bonny, instead of the N*. Easy LS6 swap!! If they put that in the GXP in a few years, sign me up.
Or, if they sold the drivetrain itself, I'd put it in mine. Obviously get a normal LS1 with 350hp.
Or, if they sold the drivetrain itself, I'd put it in mine. Obviously get a normal LS1 with 350hp.
