Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

Car Comparisons!

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 04:36 PM
  #1  
marquette97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
marquette97 is on a distinguished road
Default Car Comparisons!

I don't plan on buying a new car anytime soon, but when it does come time I have a few choices on my mind.

2000-2005 Chevy Impala: I love these, they are roomy, stylish, simple cars, and the build quality seems good as I have yet to ride in any with squeaks or rattles.

2001 Olds Aurora 4.0: Nicely styled cars, v8 engine, cheap resale, but I have heard of build quality issues, much more than impala, also smaller interior than impala.

1998-1999 Olds Aurora: I drove one awhile ago in a parkign lto at work, seemed liek a really nice car, very solid. The only thign I didn't like were some cheap interior parts (material coming off pillars, steering controls, etc)

2000 Lexus ES300 : Yes, they are very expensive still, but I really like them!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #2  
vital49's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Car Comparisons!

Originally Posted by marquette97
I don't plan on buying a new car anytime soon, but when it does come time I have a few choices on my mind.

2000-2005 Chevy Impala: I love these, they are roomy, stylish, simple cars, and the build quality seems good as I have yet to ride in any with squeaks or rattles.

2001 Olds Aurora 4.0: Nicely styled cars, v8 engine, cheap resale, but I have heard of build quality issues, much more than impala, also smaller interior than impala.

1998-1999 Olds Aurora: I drove one awhile ago in a parkign lto at work, seemed liek a really nice car, very solid. The only thign I didn't like were some cheap interior parts (material coming off pillars, steering controls, etc)

2000 Lexus ES300 : Yes, they are very expensive still, but I really like them!
I agree with you on the Impalas. You can never go wrong with a simple design. I'd buy one as a next car, too.

The 2001+ Auroras did NOT have the v8. The v8 was only available from 95-99.

The 2001+ got the Shortstar v6.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
Bonneville92V688's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Purgatory
Bonneville92V688 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Car Comparisons!

Originally Posted by vital49
The 2001+ Auroras did NOT have the v8. The v8 was only available from 95-99.
Incorrect. 01+ did have the option of the 4.0, they are just much, much more scarce.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #4  
petraman's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 0
From: Granville, Ohio ~NEBF '07 Survivor~
petraman is on a distinguished road
Default

I'd get the 97-99 Aurora
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
ReallyAGXP's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere south of Ottawa with your girlfriend driving faster then you.
ReallyAGXP is on a distinguished road
Default

I would go with the W body Impala
1. readily available parts cars
2.Solid and IMP as safe as the bonnie
3.Stylish and clean
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sol
Lounge
8
Feb 2, 2006 09:13 AM
killer_cr80r
Lounge
11
May 23, 2004 11:24 PM
Rogue
General GM Chat
22
Mar 24, 2004 11:14 AM
95BonnevilleSESC
1992-1999
2
Feb 20, 2004 01:50 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.