Why FWD?
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: vancouver, canada 1995 bonneville SSEi

Originally Posted by 95naSTA
The AWD isn't totally impossible. I know theres at least one gm AWD tranny that will bolt up to our engines. I think it was in the 6000?
Of course it'* still gonna be hard to make that trans hold up to a lot of power. And theres still a ton of custom work involved(axles, blah, blah).
Of course it'* still gonna be hard to make that trans hold up to a lot of power. And theres still a ton of custom work involved(axles, blah, blah).
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Hanoverpark/palatine IL, wrenchin' and cursin'

Originally Posted by aukc
Originally Posted by 95naSTA
The AWD isn't totally impossible. I know theres at least one gm AWD tranny that will bolt up to our engines. I think it was in the 6000?
Of course it'* still gonna be hard to make that trans hold up to a lot of power. And theres still a ton of custom work involved(axles, blah, blah).
Of course it'* still gonna be hard to make that trans hold up to a lot of power. And theres still a ton of custom work involved(axles, blah, blah).
DOUBLE the power AND get AWD!
who'* gonna be the first Twin L67 Bonnie?
oh since were' at it..... Single engine cars... WTF?
This is why I always thought FWD Bonnevilles were wrong. I've always associated drivetrains with types of cars.
FWD - small economy cars
RWD - sports/muscle/possibly luxury cars
AWD - luxury/off-road cars
FWD - small economy cars
RWD - sports/muscle/possibly luxury cars
AWD - luxury/off-road cars
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 0
From: Groton, CT _NEBF 05, 06, 07_

The fuel crisis back in the 70'* forced american auto engineers to design more fuel efficient drive trains. The Japanese & European auto makers already had front wheel drive in some of their cars.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spiral
General GM Chat
4
Apr 16, 2004 04:32 PM



