special thanks to TJ'sblackbonne
#11
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: montreal canada NEBF07 ONBF07
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tj it a 5 minuites job to take out my aeroforce so no problem if you whant to try it .so will the plug is the same on a 95
#13
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TJ'sblackbonne
As for agrazela comment, I am going to have him(firebuick) talked into, Ported LIM (he has it in his trunk and is going on very soon), an HV3, ER, Rockers, a 2.5 DP, and Ported Manifolds. I dont have a car to work on right now, so he is the lucky canadiate haha.
Hey FireBuick, maybe I can be "CinderBuick."
Interesting thing on the rockers...I just got a set of modded stockers (1.85/1.80), and I'm getting told by the online calculators (wallaceracing.com, et.al.) that I really only need "half the set" on a non-cammed, n/a engine, with head-port-matched LIM, that'* only going to spin up to 6250 or so max.
That is, the "optimal" setup, according to the calcs, is 1.85 (or 1.80, minimal difference) intake, and regular old 1.6 exhaust. If this is true, then I should see a big gain when I swap in the 1.85'* on the intake, but no real difference (possibly even a loss) when I put the 1.80'* on the exhaust. I do plan to test and report on this in the not too distant future...
(Those same calcs are giving me second thoughts about the head porting work from my other thread, but that'* a different story...)
#15
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: montreal canada NEBF07 ONBF07
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well tj was talking to me about looking for SR rockers or maybe ER rocker . but after seeing is front EM those port are bad almost 1/3 of it is block for sure we are getting KR on a L36 because of that
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post