440 hp Slug......just too phat !!!!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 13, 2005 | 12:00 PM

#11

harofreak00

BANNED

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 0

Likes: 5

From: Purgatory

blue gauges!

Jan 13, 2005 | 12:02 PM

#12

CFoote

Senior Member

Posts like a Camaro

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 1,019

Likes: 0

From: Massachusetts

Still, the STS-V is a nice car, and thats coming from a M5 owner....I wonder what the differential ratio in the STS-V is??

Jan 13, 2005 | 02:29 PM

#13

fantastic88

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 4,328

Likes: 1

From: Lakeville, MN

BTW- Hey Jim, its swap time for the Aurora.

Jan 13, 2005 | 06:01 PM

#14

repinS

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 5,158

Likes: 0

From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by Midnight Express

C&D sucks, they don't like cars from the General and it shows.

There'* a reason for that. Realistically looking, I don't think their rantings aren't completely out of left field...

Quote:

I guarentee the Hemi will be the same bulls**t. In five to ten years those engines will be dropping like flies. Trust me, do not give in to their scams. I did and I got screwed.

"Hemi" isn't some sort of special technology that can fail in the blink of an eye. Hemi motors would be just as likely to fail as non-hemi motors, assuming proper workmanship and care. It'* all a marketing gimmick, I said it once and I'll say it again, COUNTLESS mainstream (family cars included, for that matter) cars have had hemispherical-shaped combustion chambers for decades now. It'* just Chrysler just resurrecting the name, cranking out considerable hp out of a 5.7L V8, and creating a helluva a lot of hype over. Great technology, but it'* common stuff. It'd be like Pontiac acting like they pioneered the performance shift mode in the '92 SSEi...