Chevrolet When starting new posts, please specify YEAR, MAKE, MODEL, ENGINE type, and whatever modifications you have made.

4.3 to 5.7 S10 Swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 07:34 AM
  #11  
rjblazer's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 853
Likes: 32
From: Elmira, New York
rjblazer has a spectacular aura aboutrjblazer has a spectacular aura about
Default

I do remember from i think my inspection class the state dosent care if you change engines. But it is suppose to have the same emissions rating as the original or better. So a 5.7 prolly wont not make that since they didnt put them in trucks in 02. I would say me personally i would go with the 5.3.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 03:34 PM
  #12  
Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,960
Likes: 1,839
From: Dark Side, AZ
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

My current 4.3 doesnt have anything emissions really. No egr, no secondary air pump.

Yea i did notice that newer 5.3'* put out quite a bit more power than the 5.7'*.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 03:54 PM
  #13  
MouSe's Avatar
BANNED
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 4
From: Usa
MouSe is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Mike1995
My current 4.3 doesnt have anything emissions really. No egr, no secondary air pump.

Yea i did notice that newer 5.3'* put out quite a bit more power than the 5.7'*.
They also get less MPGs. My 5.3 gets 12 city and 17 highway.

My instructor has a 98 with a 5.7 and he gets the same city but his hwy is 20.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 04:01 PM
  #14  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 594
From: western,ny state
jwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond repute
Default

hes either BS'ing you or its a 2wd rcsb 5spd with stock tires

i get like 14 mixed. everyone i know with a 4wd vortec 350 gets mid teens. everyone i know with a 5.3 with stock tires can get over 20 even with 4wd
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 07:38 PM
  #15  
Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,960
Likes: 1,839
From: Dark Side, AZ
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Ok, with full size trucks getting mid teens to 20+ MPG, I wonder what I would get with just a little *-10? LoL!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 08:41 PM
  #16  
MouSe's Avatar
BANNED
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 4
From: Usa
MouSe is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jwfirebird
hes either BS'ing you or its a 2wd rcsb 5spd with stock tires

i get like 14 mixed. everyone i know with a 4wd vortec 350 gets mid teens. everyone i know with a 5.3 with stock tires can get over 20 even with 4wd
Its a Z71 4WD Ext cab regular bed with stock tires.

My Z71 CCSB does NOT get anywhere close to 20, but I do not have stock tires as they are puny little pieces of crap that do nothing good for the vehicle.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 06:22 AM
  #17  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 594
From: western,ny state
jwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond repute
Default

weight is weight for tires. but still i drove an avalanche from here to leesburg, va and got over 20. and the owner of that truck had two av'* and he said they always get that. and when i was driving my dads 2wd it was holding 24-26 instant mpg at 55. so on the highway i bet it should average over 20. everybody i talk to says it. if you have something wrong with your truck or have a impatient driver it will come down.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 06:27 AM
  #18  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 594
From: western,ny state
jwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally Posted by Mike1995
Ok, with full size trucks getting mid teens to 20+ MPG, I wonder what I would get with just a little *-10? LoL!
this one guy i used to work with claimed he could get 24-25. but he was the only one i ever heard say that. he had a auto 2.5 ext cab 2wd, with a bed cover and stock tires. he is a good driver i think though. he sold that after it had a bunch of miles and got a 2.5 colorado same config. and gets the same mileage again when most say they get closer to 20. point is should get low 20'* highway at least
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 11:17 AM
  #19  
MouSe's Avatar
BANNED
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 4
From: Usa
MouSe is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jwfirebird
weight is weight for tires. but still i drove an avalanche from here to leesburg, va and got over 20. and the owner of that truck had two av'* and he said they always get that. and when i was driving my dads 2wd it was holding 24-26 instant mpg at 55. so on the highway i bet it should average over 20. everybody i talk to says it. if you have something wrong with your truck or have a impatient driver it will come down.
Nothing wrong with my truck. Clean air filter, new plugs, new wires, run nothing but Shell or BP gas and run Seafoam every 5k.

I have 33" tires though and 3.73s. I bet that'* it more than anything.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 01:24 PM
  #20  
Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Retired
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,960
Likes: 1,839
From: Dark Side, AZ
Mike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond reputeMike has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I called the junkyard this morning and ordered a 5.7 from a 1997 Tahoe. I should be picking it up Tuesday morning. $350.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.